Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
THOMAS BICKNELL, examined by Mr. Box: I am a master mariner. I have
been coasting pilot in Australian and New Zealand waters for the last
ten years, and have been in all sorts of vessels. I knew the _Alert_
well for a great number of years. I have been often on board of her,
and frequently a passenger in her to Geelong and back. I considered
her a very unsuitable boat even for the Geelong trade, or anywhere
else in the Bay; for outside the Heads she was a perfect water trap.
Her extreme length did not compare with her depth, and she had a very
narrow beam. She was very fine, with no bearings, and not sufficient
stability. Her engines and boilers were well aft, and gave her a lift
in the bow, at the same time depressing her stern. I have seen the
pantry window, but did not pay much attention to it. Placed close
to long, narrow alleyways that window would be dangerous unless
properly constructed and secured. It should have been secured from
the outside so that the pressure of water on the outside cover would
have tightened it instead of forcing its way through. Water in the
saloon of a vessel labouring in the sea would make her unmanageable.
I saw the grating. There should have been an iron door on hinges over
it, and over that a tarpaulin, because a tarpaulin in itself is not
sufficient. Forty-four tons of cargo, composed of wattle bark and
furniture, would have very little effect on the _Alert_. She was very
tender and crank. Had that cargo been iron or ballast, it would have
kept the ship out of difficulties, provided she had after canvas to
keep her to the wind. In a case like hers you lose seaway, and you
want after canvas to give the ship steering way. I saw the wooden
awning. It would help to put the vessel down, and the wind would
catch it and keep her down. It should have been made capable of being
taken in in rough weather. A vessel lying over like the _Alert_ did
would no doubt take water in every opening. Her freeboard was about
one foot eight inches, and that is very low. I have seen her with
her gunwale almost level with the water. If the bunker lids were not
properly secured, then they were dangerous. A vessel leaning over
very much is likely to throw them off. Knocking about as she was, the
water would hit against the lee cover and throw it off, and if there
was any water on the deck, it would pour down below.
[Illustration: Decoration]
FOOTNOTES:
[1] The “Rip” is the name applied by seamen to a very strong, nasty
current which runs immediately at the Heads entrance. With the wind
in and the tide out, or _vice versa_, a dangerous joggle of waves
arise.
[Illustration: Decoration]
KILPATRICK v. HUDDART, PARKER & CO., LTD.
FOURTH DAY, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1895.
_Evidence for the Plaintiff._—(_Continued._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account