Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
Cross-examined by Mr. Smyth: I have had a vessel pretty well over
with her yard arms in the water. She came up again by throwing cargo
overboard. There is nothing extraordinary in a vessel rolling over
45 degrees. There is nothing to prevent a ship from righting herself
if she is sea-worthy. I have not the faintest idea what prevented
the _Alert_ from righting herself. I don’t think thirty or forty
tons of water on board of her ought to affect her although she was
low aft. Perhaps the pantry window would have been better if made in
some other way than with glass; but I consider it of no importance.
Anybody could have stopped it splendidly with a cushion. If there
was a lot of water in the stoke-hole as well as the saloon, she
might founder. I do not believe that water came through the grating.
In sending a ship to sea extreme contingencies should be provided
against. An open grating was not unsafe, but still it would be better
covered. I am a contractor for painting ships for Huddart, Parker,
and others.
In reply to His Honour the witness said: Cutting a small window would
not weaken the bulk-head. I think it most likely I would have had an
outside shutter to protect the window.
[Illustration: Decoration]
[Illustration: Decoration]
KILPATRICK v. HUDDART, PARKER & CO., LTD.
SIXTH DAY, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1895.
_ Evidence for the Defendants.—(Continued.)_
HUGH BELL MCMEIKAN, examined by Mr. Mitchell, stated: I am master of
the tug boat _Albatross_. I have had experience at sea since 1850.
I have been Master of all sorts of vessels. I knew the _Alert_, and
have been on board of her often. So far as I saw she was all right.
I saw her outside the Heads after she went into the Gippsland trade.
She always behaved well so far as I saw. I have seen the pantry
window often; it would not make the vessel unsea-worthy.
HIS HONOUR: We have heard that when this vessel got within two miles
of the Schanck, she made an offing of about six miles. Supposing you
had been on board of her then with a strong sea running from the S.
E., and wind from the S. W., would you, before putting the ship away
on her course to the Heads, have taken any precautions with regard to
the window? _A._—No, I don’t think I would. It had been there long
before, and had not been found fault with. If I had been in command
of that ship, I would have given orders to the officers to see that
everything was snug. I never heard in my life of a bunker lid coming
off by the rolling of a vessel. I don’t see that the wooden awning
or the forty-four tons of cargo had anything to do with the vessel’s
sea-worthiness. She was sea-worthy enough to come up from Gippsland
to where she did.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account