Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
GILBERT MOORE, examined by Mr. Mitchell, stated: I am a master
mariner in charge of the S.S. _Excelsior_, one of Huddart, Parker
& Co’s steamers trading between Melbourne and Geelong. I knew the
_Alert_, and was in command of her. For two or three winters I was
trading with her to Geelong and back to Melbourne, and sometimes
we had heavy weather. She behaved very well indeed. Sometimes in
bad weather she would not behave very grand. In moderate, good,
and fine weather she was beautiful. I went to Tasmania in her in
February, 1893. I had no cargo going over, but coming back I had I
daresay about seventy tons. We had fine weather going but a stiff
breeze coming back. She behaved well and was a bit wet. I remember
the pantry window; it did not affect the ship in any way. It was
about eighteen inches above the deck. It was sufficiently secured to
withstand the pressure of water. The bunker lids had slots and turned
round, thus fixing them in. I saw that they were fastened. I can’t
see how the wooden awning or the open grating would make the ship
unsea-worthy. It is a matter of opinion. There was a tarpaulin to
cover the grating if they liked to put it on.
_Q._—What in your opinion should have been done with the vessel
before changing her course for the Heads? _A._—I would have put the
engines dead slow. As a matter of course a man, in weather like she
was in, should have seen that everything was secure. If I had to run
the ship, I would keep the engines slow; and if I had a sail, I would
set it. If the sea was too heavy and she would not come to the wind,
I would let go a sea anchor.
Cross-examined by Mr. Smyth: I knew the late Captain Mathieson. He
was a careful seaman, and a good ship master. He would be the best
judge of what he ought to do. The grating was six feet wide, and fore
and aft from eleven to thirteen inches.
_Q._—Supposing Mr. Grant, the man who put the grating in, said it
was twelve feet across and three feet six inches long? _A._—I know
differently; I never measured it, but I say it was not three feet
long.
_Q._—You looked very particularly before you went to Tasmania to see
that the bunker lids were fastened with slots? _A._—Yes, I did. I
considered it necessary. They fitted properly and were caught with
slots.
_Q._—If you were the only witness out of thirty who said these lids
did not fit in by their own weight, will you contradict them all?
_A._—Yes.
_Q._—If Mr. Grant, who fitted them in, states that the lids secured
themselves only by their own weight, do you contradict him? _A._—Yes;
I say what I know.
_Q._—You swore at the Marine Board enquiry that you took the _Alert_
to Tasmania as a trial trip? _A._—I meant to say it was a severe
trial to the ship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account