Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
Cross-examined by Mr. Smyth: The vessel cost about £12,000 at first,
and we expended £7,000 on her here, putting in new machinery in
1893. On the voyage out from England she was insured for £12,000.
She came out under sail, as a barque, with funnels down. She was
then in charge of Captain Munn, who gave her the character of a
splendid sea-boat. He told me that. He is dead now. At the time she
was trading in the Bay I believe the insurance was less than £4,000.
I was managing director of the Company. I am not so now. I am still
a member of the firm and also a member of the Marine Board. During
my twelve years’ command of the _Alert_ in the Bay, I have seen her
take some water on board. She did not quite fill the alleyways. She
could not fill them as the water ran away through the port-holes
and the scuppers. The pantry window was glass in my time. It was
cracked by heat but not by water. I never gave instructions to
Captain Mathieson to hurry up. I told him not to go so fast, and
complained about too much coal being used. There might have been a
time when she was in the Bay trade that she was not insured at all.
She got Lloyd’s certificate in 1877 when she was built, and that was
allowed to drop until 1893. We did not find it necessary to put her
on Lloyd’s Register again in 1893; it was for our own convenience to
put her back on it so as to give her a character again, in case we
wanted to sell her. We paid the fees, £5 5s., for putting her back on
Lloyd’s Register. My company subscribed £100 to the fund got up for
the _Alert_ sufferers. Ponting had some I believe. He got it through
us. I don’t think Huddart, Parker & Co. paid him anything at all.
There was £1,200 subscribed. Mrs. Kilpatrick got her portion of that.
I don’t think Huddart, Parker & Co. gave her anything. Only one writ
has been served on Huddart and Parker in addition to the present
case. I believe the plaintiff in the other case is Mrs. Mathieson—the
late captain’s wife. I consider we did our duty when my firm gave
£100 to the relief fund, to which the public subscribed £1,100 more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account