Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
wind, being abeam, would enter on the upper or weather side, and
must rush through to leeward or downward, thus having a powerfully
depressing effect upon the ship. Further, if the awning happened
to be choked to leeward by the sea, the depressing tendency would
thereby be rendered all the more acute, by reason of the wind not
being able to get out. Even a schoolboy, if he gave the subject the
slightest reflection, would be convinced that in this case, as in
every other, the wind must follow the dictates of nature, instead of
being guided by the theories of non-practical men. Another witness
for the defence—who also is not a sailor—averred that “the amount of
freeboard a ship has is no proof of her sea-worthiness.” This is true
in a sense, for different ships require to be loaded, or trimmed, in
different ways. I have been in ships that were at their best when
trimmed a few inches by the head, but I never saw, or heard of, a
long, small ship—except, of course, the _Alert_—that was considered
in good trim to go to sea with a freeboard aft of only a few inches,
and nearly the whole of her out of the water foreward! I don’t say
that it is impossible for a vessel in the last named condition to be
sea-worthy, but I do say that I would have to be out at sea with her
a few times in a breeze of wind before I believed it. While dealing
with weather, I may as well point out that Captain Barrett of the
ship _Hesperus_—although his vessel was not within a hundred miles of
where the _Alert_ was—said in his evidence that “it was so bad that
he did not think it just to take a pilot for his ship on account of
the danger to which he (the pilot) would be exposed in boarding on
the afternoon of the _Alert’s_ wreck.” Good, kind, considerate man!
he is just the sort of captain I should like to sail with. Then Pilot
Mitchell also stated that “the weather was so bad between three and
five on the afternoon of 28th December, 1893, that he did not think
he would have boarded any ship at that time.” However, just as there
are different ways of trimming ships, so there are different ways
of getting a pilot on board. As a case in point, I remember on one
voyage we were bound to Queenstown (Cork) for orders. While we were
still out of sight of land—it being at least a hundred miles off—a
pilot boat bore down on us one morning in answer to our signal.
A gale of wind was blowing, and a very heavy sea running at the
time, so much so that if the “hooker” (a name given to Queenstown
pilot boats) had come alongside of us she would have been instantly
swamped. To have attempted to lower a small boat, either from our
ship or the “hooker,” would have been utter madness, as no boat could
have lived in such a sea. After bringing the “hooker” near enough to
make a bargain, by word of mouth, as to the cost of taking us into
port, one of the pilots sung out for us to heave a deep sea leadline
on board of the “hooker.” Our best leadsman threw, after three or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account