Beaumarchais and the War of American Independence, Vol. 1Kite, Elizabeth Sarah
History
Beaumarchais and the War of American Independence, Vol. 1
Kite, Elizabeth Sarah
Beaumarchais, Pierre Augustin Caron de, 1732-1799; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Participation, French
“He then obtained permission,” says Loménie, “to have his _Barbier_
played. Between the obtaining of the permission and the presentation he
put himself at his ease; his comedy had been prohibited because of
pretended allusions which did not exist; he compensated himself for this
unjust prohibition by inserting precisely all the allusions which the
authorities feared to find in it and which were not there. He reinforced
it with a great number of satirical generalities, with a host of more or
less audacious puns. He added a good many lengthy passages, increased it
by an act and overcharged it so completely that it fell flat the day of
its first appearance before the public.”
The defeat was all the more striking because of the fame of the author;
the public curiosity so long kept in abeyance had brought such a crowd to
the first presentation as had never before been equalled in the annals of
the theater.
“Never,” says Grimm, “had a first presentation attracted so many people.”
The surprise of himself and his friends was extreme, for Beaumarchais
instead of applause received the hisses of the parterre. Anyone else might
have been discouraged, or at least disturbed by so unexpected a turn, not
so Beaumarchais.
In his own account of the defeat, wittily told in the famous preface to
the Barbier, published three months later, he says, “The god of Cabal is
irritated; I said to the comedians with force, ‘Children, a sacrifice here
is necessary,’ and so giving the devil his part, and tearing my
manuscript, ‘god of the hissers, spitters, coughers, disturbers,’ I cried,
‘thou must have blood, drink my fourth act and may thy fury be appeased.’
In the instant you should have heard that infernal noise which made the
actors grow pale, and falter, weaken in the distance and die away.” But
Beaumarchais did more than simply renounce an act, he set instantly to
work to rearrange and purify the whole play.
“Surely it is no common thing,” says Loménie, “to see an author pick up a
piece justly fallen, and within twenty-four hours ... transform it so that
it becomes a charming production, full of life and movement....”
At its second production, “everyone laughed, and applauded from one end to
the other of the piece; its cause was completely gained.” (Gudin)
What Beaumarchais did, was to restore the piece to about the form which
had been approved and signed by the censors.
Some of the best of the satirical portions which are to be found in the
printed play, nevertheless, were inserted before the first presentation,
these he dared to retain in the final form.
In accounting for its fall, Gudin says, “A superabundance of _esprit_
produced satiety and fatigued the audience. Beaumarchais then set about
pruning his too luxuriantly branching tree, pulled off the leaves which
hid the flowers--thus allowing one to taste all the charm of its details.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account