Bedouins: $b Mary Garden, Debussy, Chopin or the circus, Botticelli, Poe, Brahmsody, Anatole France, Mirbeau, Caruso on wheels, Calico cats, The artistic temperament; Idols and ambergris, with The supreme sin, Grindstones, A masque of music, and The vision malefic; with various portraits of Mary Garden in operatic costumeHuneker, James
History
Bedouins: $b Mary Garden, Debussy, Chopin or the circus, Botticelli, Poe, Brahmsody, Anatole France, Mirbeau, Caruso on wheels, Calico cats, The artistic temperament; Idols and ambergris, with The supreme sin, Grindstones, A masque of music, and The vision malefic; with various portraits of Mary Garden in operatic costume
Huneker, James
Garden, Mary, 1874-1967; Music -- History and criticism; Sopranos (Singers)
“Mr. Huneker is, in the best sense, a critic; he listens to the
music and gives you his impressions as rapidly and in as few words
as possible; or he sketches the composers in fine, broad, sweeping
strokes with a magnificent disregard for unimportant details. And as
Mr. Huneker is, as I have said, a powerful personality, a man of quick
brain and an energetic imagination, a man of moods and temperament--a
string that vibrates and sings in response to music--we get in these
essays of his a distinctly original and very valuable contribution to
the world’s tiny musical literature.”
--J. F. RUNCIMAN, in _London Saturday Review_.
IVORY APES AND PEACOCKS
“Out of the depressing welter of our American writing upon æsthetics,
with its incredible thinness and triteness and paltriness, its
intellectual sterility, its miraculous dulness, its limitless and
appalling vapidity, Mr. James Huneker, and the small and honorable
minority of his peers, emerge with a conspicuousness that is both
comforting and disgraceful.... Susceptibility, clairvoyance, immediacy
of response, are his; he is the friend of any talent that is fine and
strange and frank enough to incur the dislike of the mighty army of
Bourbons, Puritans, and Bœotians. He is innocent of prepossessions.
He is infinitely flexible and generous. Yet if, in the twenty years
that we have been reading him, he has ever praised a commonplace
talent, we have no recollection of it. His critical tact is well-nigh
infallible.... His position among writers on æsthetics is anomalous and
incredible: no merchant traffics in his heart, yet he commands a large,
an eager, an affectionate public. Is it because he is both vivid and
acute, robust yet fine-fingered, tolerant yet unyielding, astringent
yet tender--a mellow pessimist, a kindly cynic? Or is it rather
because he is, primarily, a temperament--dynamic, contagious, lovable,
inveterately alive--expressing itself through the most transparent of
the arts?”
--LAWRENCE GILMAN, in _North American Review_ (October, 1915).
NEW COSMOPOLIS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account