Belford's Magazine, Volume II, No. 8, January, 1889Various
History
Belford's Magazine, Volume II, No. 8, January, 1889
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Edgar Fawcett is given to a delineation of social life in New York.
This is a wide and varied field, and the author makes it intensely
interesting. We have called attention, however, to the fact that he is
not altogether correct. The English motive, of turning the interest
upon social caste, is not true when applied to our mixed condition. We
have no aristocratic class, as recognized in England; and the
assumption of such in real life is too ludicrous and unreal for the
purpose of the novelist. Mere wealth without culture, and culture
without wealth, contend in a mixed condition with each other, without
supplying the interest to be found in earnest endeavor to overcome
unjust distinctions and power. When Mr. Fawcett does deal with a class
he is not always just. In his _Miriam Balestier_, published in the
November number of BELFORD'S, by far the most artistically beautiful
work from the pen of our author, he by implication attacks an entire
profession that has held through generations not only the admiration
but love of the public. There is absolutely nothing in the vocation of
an actor that either degrades or demoralizes. On the contrary, there
is much to elevate and refine--the work sustained by art found in
painting and music, the thought and feelings of the poets; and while
this is meant to amuse, the stage has been the most potent factor in
not only furthering civilization and culture in the masses, but
awaking in the hearts of the many the loftiest patriotism known to
humanity. It has awakened a deeper feeling for the home, a firmer
trust in the law of right, and a stronger faith in virtue than aught
else of human origin. That taints, stains, and abuses have attached is
no fault of the drama. One could as well attack the bar or the pulpit
because a few unworthy members have disgraced themselves, as to hold
the stage responsible for the recognized evils that have fastened
themselves to a part. That we have senseless burlesques and lascivious
exhibits of nakedness at a majority of our theatres is the fault of
the patrons, not the stage. The manager, like any other dealer in
commercial wares, caters to the taste of his customers, and the stage
is no more responsible for their productions than the street is for
the wretched street-walker.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account