Belgium -- History -- German occupation, 1914-1918
Thus they are now trying to make people believe that Louvain was not
intentionally burned, but that the town suffered a bombardment. This
is the legend which they related to Dr. Sven Hedin, while calling his
attention to the accuracy of their fire:--
"Eleven miles to Louvain. Once in the town one goes a good way
before coming to the first ruins. By no means all Louvain has
been destroyed by the bombardment, as is imagined. Hardly a fifth
of the town is destroyed. It is true that this fifth included
many precious buildings, which cannot be replaced; particularly
regrettable is the loss of the library. In the midst of this
destruction, however, like a rock in the midst of the sea, rises
the Hôtel de Ville, the proud jewel of the period of 1450, with its
six slender open towers. I went right round the Hôtel de Ville, and
I could not with the best will in the world discover a scratch on
these walls, with their prodigal richness of ornamentation. Perhaps
there may somewhere be a scratch from a shell-splinter which
escaped my eyes. Thanks to the excellence of the German fire not a
single moulding of the six towers has been damaged. The reason for
the bombardment of Louvain is known. The civil population fired
from the windows on the German troops at the time of their entering
the town, and as this crime could not be punished otherwise, the
houses were burned by bombardment. When the German soldiers sought
to extinguish the flames in the houses adjacent to the Hôtel de
Ville the francs-tireurs again fired on them with their carbines.
_Any other army in the world would have done the same_, and the
Germans have themselves profoundly regretted that they were forced
against their will to resort to such means."
(SVEN HEDIN, _Ein Volk in Waffen_, p. 149.)
They told the same story at Termonde to Herren Koester and Noske: "It
is certain," say these gentlemen, "that Termonde was not intentionally
burned."
On the other hand, the Germans try to dissemble the extent of the
damage inflicted. In the October issue of the official and propagandist
_Journal de la Guerre_ they give a plan of Louvain on which the parts
destroyed are shown by shading. Now this plan is falsified in two
ways. In the first place, no distinction is made between the portion
built on and that occupied by market gardeners, which is considerable;
so that the ratio of the part destroyed to the part left intact is
distorted. Secondly, this portion is absolutely diminished; many
quarters burned are shown as intact; to mention only one example, the
Old Market, where only the College of the Josephites and a few adjacent
houses have been left standing, is marked as untouched by fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account