WE this morning paid a visit to M. Liedtz, the minister of the
interior, in his hotel at the “Palais de la Nation.” It is rather
remarkable that neither the actual eruption of the revolution nor its
subsequent influence, has been sufficient to draw forth any individual
of leading genius, to give a complexion to the policy of the new
state. The actors who have played the most prominent _rôle_ during the
last ten years have been a few of the ancient Catholic noblesse, whose
titles gave éclat to the movement, but who have long since withdrawn
into retirement, or ceased to take a lead in the administration--and
the body of lawyers whose professional aptitude to promote or profit
by any change, has enabled them to step over the heads of their less
adroit, but not less qualified associates, and to appropriate to
themselves the “loaves and fishes” of office. Lastly, there were “the
masses” whose impetuosity achieved the revolution, the “patrioterie”
who form the tools of every revolution to be worked for the benefit of
their more clear sighted superiors. But the daring spirits of 1830 have
all disappeared; the present times do not require such fiery agents;
the violence which effects a revolution, must be the first thing to
be got rid of by those who would perpetuate it, and who speedily
learn to exchange the exciting demand of “_delenda est Carthago_,”
for the milder supplication of “_panem et Circenses_.” In this way
the Masaniello of the revolution, M. de Potter, having been given to
comprehend that his services had been rendered, and his presence no
longer desirable, has long since withdrawn himself to ponder over, and,
it is even added, _to regret_ the events of 1830; but certainly to
lament, in strong terms, his disappointment at their practical results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account