The mania originated with some similar undertakings projected by
the King of Holland, but which being prudently conducted were
moderately successful. But never was theory more vividly exemplified,
in practice, than were the warnings of Adam Smith realized in the
case of the Belgium companies; without either of his two essentials
to success--“monopoly or defined and limited action;” they burst at
once into all the pathless wilds of speculation and extravagance. To
success in any industrial undertaking, two things are essential, _mind
and money_; but the shareholders of a company contribute only the
latter, leaving the supply of the former to a directory: the partners
are only called upon to _pay_ and not to _think_, so that the mass of
their capital is unrepresented by an equivalent proportion of intellect
and forethought. The _general_ result of this, is the failure that
invariably accompanies neglect, and even the works which are undertaken
are never pushed with vigour, or expanded by new discoveries and
inventions. These are the offspring of that anxious exertion of all
the faculties of the brain which accompanies the watchful prudence of
a man, who has his whole fortune at stake, and is dependent upon his
individual genius. But the holder of a joint-stock share, who throws
his contribution into the general fund, and sends twice a year for his
dividend, (perhaps, without receiving it,) has neither the information
nor the interest that are indispensable to stimulate improvements.
Mistakes and errors are thus constantly occurring, and losses
supervene; these, on their first appearance, would alarm and deter a
private individual from incurring further risk, and he would prepare,
at once, to retrieve his capital; but to the officers of a company
these occurrences are matters of comparative indifference, so long as
the last shilling of the paid up funds remains to meet their salaries
as they fall due. And even the proprietary themselves, though conscious
of the diminution of their profits, do not feel it so acutely, coming
as it does off so large a fund, and are, besides, spurred on by the
spirit of rivalry to incur the temporary loss, in order to drive some
competing company from the field, which is only to be done by the
largeness of their transactions; on the principle of the match-seller,
who lost a trifle upon every bundle, and would be ruined were it not
for the vast extent of the business which he did.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account