Benjamin Franklin; Self-Revealed, Volume 2 (of 2): A Biographical and Critical Study Based Mainly on his own WritingsBruce, Wiliam Cabell
History
Benjamin Franklin; Self-Revealed, Volume 2 (of 2): A Biographical and Critical Study Based Mainly on his own Writings
Bruce, Wiliam Cabell
Franklin, Benjamin, 1706-1790
nor is it of much importance to us [he adds] to know
the manner in which nature executes her laws. 'Tis
enough if we know the laws themselves. 'Tis of real use
to know that china left in the air unsupported will
fall and break; but _how_ it comes to fall, and _why_
it breaks, are matters of speculation. 'Tis a pleasure
indeed to know them, but we can preserve our china
without it.
He anticipated, or, in some instances, all but anticipated, several of the
more important discoveries of modern electrical science. He knew that,
when a number of Leyden jars are connected up under certain conditions, the
extent, to which each jar can be charged from a given source, varies
inversely as the number of jars. For a time, he was puzzled by the fact
that the light of a candle, or of a fire-coal, or of red-hot iron, would
destroy the repellency between his electrified ball and shot, but that the
light of the sun would not. But it was not long before he hit upon this
ingenious explanation:
This different Effect probably did not arise from any
difference in the light, but rather from the particles
separated from the candle, being first attracted and
then repelled, carrying off the electric matter with
them; and from the rarefying the air, between the
glowing coal or red-hot iron, and the electrised shot,
through which rarefied air the electric fluid could
more readily pass.
Referring to what Franklin had to say about the action of sunlight in this
connection, Arthur Schuster, in his _Some Remarkable Passages in the
Writings of Benjamin Franklin_, observes: "Had Franklin used a clean piece
of zinc instead of iron shot he might have anticipated Hertz's discovery of
the action of strong light on the discharge of gases."
In the course of one of his experiments with an electrified can, Franklin
reached the conclusion that a cork, which he had lowered into the can, was
not attracted to its internal surface, as it would have been to its
external, because the mutual repulsion of the two inner opposite sides of
the can might prevent the accumulation of an electrical atmosphere upon
them. From the same experiment, the genius of Henry Cavendish deduced his
law that electrical repulsion varies inversely as the square of the
distance between the charges.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account