Betsy Gaskins (Dimicrat), Wife of Jobe Gaskins (Republican): Or, Uncle Tom's Cabin Up to DateHood, W. I. (William I.)
General
Betsy Gaskins (Dimicrat), Wife of Jobe Gaskins (Republican): Or, Uncle Tom's Cabin Up to Date
Hood, W. I. (William I.)
Gold; Interest; Money; Paper money -- United States; Populism
Mr. Hendrix described at some length the process by which the gold was
withdrawn by speculators for shipment abroad, and then proceeded to
contrast this with the situation in France, where the Bank of France
refused to pay, except where actually necessary, more than five per
cent. of gold on its demand obligations. These aggressions on our gold
reserve must be stopped, and if the pending bill would stop them, afford
relief, take the government out of the banking business, as it has been
taken out of the silver business, he would vote for it.
“Does the action of the Bank of France, in refusing to pay more than
five per cent. in gold,” asked Mr. Hepburn, “impair the credit of that
bank?”
“No.”
“Then would the credit of the United States be impaired if the United
States should exercise its discretion and redeem the Sherman notes in
silver?”
“Yes, I believe it would at this time,” replied Mr. Hendrix.
“Why?”
“Because of the general distrust of the government’s ability to pay in
gold. One hundred and fifty-nine million dollars of Sherman gold
promises [?] to pay cannot be met without gold.”
“But the notes are redeemable in coin, not in gold,” was Mr. Hepburn’s
parting shot.
Mr. Hepburn declared that Mr. Hendrix had pointed out unwittingly the
remedy for the present evil when he told the House that the great
banking houses of Europe exercised their discretion about depleting
their gold vaults. “Why will not the Secretary of the Treasury exercise
the same discretion?” he asked, amid a round of applause. “The exercise
of this discretion did not impair the credit of European banks. Who
dared to say that the credit of this country, with 65,000,000 people
behind it, and an unlimited taxing power, would be impaired because it
refused to kneel at the demands of the Shylocks?”
“Why have not the Republican Secretaries of the Treasury exercised that
discretion?” asked Mr. Pence of Colorado.
“I have not been Secretary of the Treasury,” replied Mr. Hepburn hotly.
“When I am I will answer. I am as fully convinced, however, as I am that
I am alive, that if the Secretary of the Treasury were now to exercise
his discretion and pay gold when legitimate redemptions were asked, and
refuse it to sharks and speculators, the evils from which we suffer
would cease to be.”
A broader view is that the prime motive of the Secretary in exercising
his discretion should be the welfare of the government; and gold should
be refused where its payment is likely to hurt the treasury.
----------
In the foregoing pages we have attempted to give such a bird’s-eye view
of American money and finance as would serve as an example and warning
for the future. We behold in this short story how our finances were
continually run upon the rocks and shoals of a false “political
economy,” so-called, and how they were occasionally pulled off—though
remaining most of the time stuck fast in the most dismal way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account