Better babies and their careRichardson, Anna Steese
Science
Better babies and their care
Richardson, Anna Steese
Infants -- Care; Infants -- Health and hygiene
Barring deformities and constitutional defects, the average baby is
pliable in the hands of the mother. The preceding chapters have told
how a mother can give her child a fair start by intelligent care and
feeding. In this chapter we will go farther and show how the mother can
guard against ugliness in looks and character.
Mothers—and doctors—are waking up to the realization that preventive
medicine is the crying need among babies. The day when babies were
supposed to “outgrow” certain disfigurements or tendencies to disease
or weakness is past. Most of us can look back to the barbarous practice
of soothing a baby with paregoric and then trusting to nature to
relieve the condition which made soothing necessary. We really seemed
to think that a miracle would be worked while the baby slept!
If a baby had any terrible deformity or acute disease we turned to
a surgeon or physician, but we took long chances when the baby was
merely good. We never stopped to figure that a good baby could be made
a better baby by intelligent care, a better baby transformed into a
well-nigh perfect baby. And yet parents owe to the children they bring
into the world precisely this care.
One of the most interesting features of the Better Babies Contests
which I have visited has been the amazement of some mothers when they
discovered that, with a little care and attention, they could work such
wonders in their babies. As an example, in one city near New York, the
physicians in charge of the examinations at a contest asked me if I
would attend a meeting or “dress rehearsal” of the examination a few
weeks before the contest. They wanted a demonstration of just how
babies are examined by a scorecard. So all the arrangements were made,
the physicians agreeing to have a real baby on hand for a “model,” to
undergo the full examination.
The baby was scored precisely as if a regular contest were under way,
and was penalized 5 points for a rough skin and 15 points for an
eruption. The mother protested vigorously. The doctors showed her a
fine eruption over the abdomen and under the armpits. She declared that
the child had always had the marks—they were a sort of birthmark. The
doctors explained that such an eruption indicated overfeeding. Here
was a bottle-fed baby getting too heavy fare. The mother admitted that
she knew nothing about modifying the milk. The doctors told her how it
should be done.
The roughness of the skin was due to mosquito bites, numbers of them.
The mother said that she couldn’t help that and neither could the baby.
That was the fault of the mosquitoes! The doctors did not agree with
her. They explained that a careful mother protected her child from the
mosquitoes with a netting, that mosquitoes carried disease, that the
itching sores made the baby nervous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account