Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.Plutarch
Religion
Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.
Plutarch
Ethics -- Greece; Ethics -- History; Stoics
Plutarch’s merits as a historical writer are seriously impaired by his
readiness to believe everything that comes to him through tradition or
record. Still one ought not to blame him for not being what he does not
profess to be. His main purpose is not to attain historical truth, but
to discover what will “point a moral, or adorn a tale.” Had he been
other than he was he would never have been so assiduously read.
Plutarch fully recognized the importance of the family in the social
fabric. This is the more to his credit for the reason that the trend of
public opinion was against him in this respect. All the evidence we have
goes to show that he was a judicious father, a loving husband, a dutiful
son, and an affectionate brother. He is thus a zealous defender of the
virtues he himself exemplified. A knowledge of his character, as shown
by his conduct, contributes not a little to the pleasure the modern
reader finds in the perusal of his pages. How often, alas! do we
discover on closer examination a great gulf between what men write and
what they do! How often does a knowledge of the private life of a great
writer mar the interest we take in what he writes!
Though a man of kind heart and polished manners, judged by the standard
of his time, Plutarch was no reformer. Indeed, no reform was possible by
means of his didactic method. He does not denounce vigourously the
corruptions of his time. He is far from employing the drastic speech of
his Roman contemporaries. It is probable that in his secluded home he
did not know or even suspect the moral degradation of the world around
him; it is certain he had not fathomed it. He knows something of the
Jewish religion, and might have known more, had he cared to inform
himself. He might have heard Paul’s preaching; and Christianity had
gained a firm foothold in Greece before Plutarch’s death. But he was too
much of a Greek to take any interest in what had no relation either to
Greek religion or tradition. The new faith in virtue of its origin, was
foolishness to him. He considered the Hellenic religion good enough for
anybody and everybody. It might indeed need purification from some of
its grosser elements and exotic excrescences; but more than this was
wholly unnecessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account