Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.Plutarch
Religion
Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.
Plutarch
Ethics -- Greece; Ethics -- History; Stoics
The student of Greek history is often inclined to believe that the bane
of Hellenic statesmanship was the bitter rivalry that always existed
between the different polities. From the standpoint of the philosopher
this view is correct. If the energies devoted to the means and methods
of mutual destruction had been expended on the arts of peace, not only
Greece, but the entire world would, to-day, present a widely different
aspect. However much the moralist may deplore the existing conditions,
the man who takes the world as it is cannot fail to see that the utmost
strength of a nation is always put forth in war and for warlike
purposes. It was so with the Greeks. Political rivalry was the strongest
stimulus under which they acted. It was their life and growth, and to a
large extent the measure of their prosperity. When political rivalries
were extinguished by Alexander, and more effectually by the Romans, the
spirit of Greece, too, died out. The Romans, especially in their first
contact with Greece, were too much barbarians to have any sympathy with
the best that Greece had to offer. A genius for government is not
necessarily a mark of advanced civilization. It is true there were at
all times men among the Romans able to appreciate the proud preeminence
of the Greeks in arts and letters, but their numbers were too few to
make any general impression. The leading families, including most of the
emperors, were familiar with the Greek language and used it with ease;
but there were few Romans who did not despise the Greeks and regard them
as inferiors. Nations, like individuals, feel more or less contempt for
those whose tastes are different from their own; and in the case before
us, the Greeks being the weaker, were the chief sufferers. But just as
rich men sometimes buy books and statuary of which they do not know the
value, and collect libraries which they cannot read, because intelligent
people take pleasure in these things, so a certain class of Romans
affected a fondness for Greek art and literature and philosophy. An
enormous quantity of works of Greek art was transported across the
Adriatic by the Romans with small advantage to the pillagers or to the
nation. Notwithstanding the predilection of some of the leading families
for Greek culture, their influence made no deep and lasting impression
on Roman thought, in the better sense. Rome always showed itself much
more receptive toward what is debasing than for what was ennobling.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account