Bibliographic Notes on One Hundred Books Famous in English LiteratureKent, Henry Watson
History
Bibliographic Notes on One Hundred Books Famous in English Literature
Kent, Henry Watson
Best books; English literature -- First editions -- Bibliography; English literature -- History and criticism
The Longmans, "honest, rugged, punctual-looking people," said
little to the point, however, and then, through Lord Jeffrey's
efforts in his behalf, Murray offered as follows: "The short
of it is this: Murray will print an edition (750 copies) of
Dreck on the half-profit system (that is, I getting _nothing_,
but also giving nothing); after which the sole copyright of
the book is to be mine...."
Carlyle then tried Colburn & Bentley, but with his mind made
up "unless they say about 100 l. I will prefer Murray." These
negotiations came to nothing, and back he went to Murray,
whose offer "is not so bad: 750 copies for the task of
publishing poor Dreck, and the rest of him _our own_." The
terms were accepted, the manuscript was sent to the printer,
and a page set up, when Murray repented his bargain, which had
never pleased him, and, having heard that Carlyle had carried
his MS. elsewhere, he seized the opportunity to send the
author a note saying that since he had, unbeknown to him,
carried his book to "the greatest publishers in London, who
had declined to engage in it," he must ask to have it read by
some literary friend, before he could in justice to himself
engage in the printing of it. The upshot was that the
manuscript was returned to its author.
"The printing of 'Teufelsdröckh,'" Carlyle says to his wife,
"which I announced as commencing, and even sent you a specimen
of, has altogether stopped, and Murray's bargain with me has
burst into air. The man behaved like a pig, and was speared,
but perhaps without art; Jack and I at least laughed that
night _à gorge déployée_ at the answer I wrote his base
_glare_ of a letter: he has written again in much politer
style, and I shall answer him, as McLeod advised my
grandfather's people, 'sharp but mannerly.' The truth of the
matter is now clear enough; Dreck cannot be disposed of
in London at this time. Whether he lie in my trunk or in a
bookseller's coffer seems partly indifferent. Neither, on the
whole, do I know whether it is not better that we have stopped
for the present. Money I was to have none; author's vanity
embarked on that bottom I have almost none; nay, some time
or other that the book can be _so_ disposed of it is certain
enough."
Nearly two years later, in 1833, the unlucky Dreck was
published "piecemeal," in ten parts of ten pages each, in
_Fraser's Magazine_, beginning with November and running
until August, 1834. With the shrewdness of his tribe, Fraser,
fearing failure, paid only twelve guineas a sheet for the
work, though he had been paying its author twenty guineas
a sheet, five guineas more than he paid to any other
contributor. It turned out, however, that he was wise, for the
great essay was not a success, even in the magazine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account