Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
His earliest work, “Clavis Astronomiæ,” first appeared during 1725, but
it is only in the second and enlarged new edition of it in Horrebow’s
“Operum Mathematico-Physicorum,” Havn. 1740, Vol. I. p. 317, that
will be found the passage (s. 226) in which the luminous process of
the sun is characterized as a perpetual northern light. Humboldt,
who mentions the fact (“Cosmos,” 1859, Vol. V. p. 81) suggests that a
comparison be made of Horrebow’s statement with the precisely similar
views held by Sir William Herschel (1738–1822) and Sir John Frederick
William Herschel (1792–1871). He says that Horrebow, who did not
confound gravitation with magnetism, was the first who thus designated
the process of light produced in the solar atmosphere by the agency of
powerful magnetic forces (“Mémoires de Mathématiques et de Physique,
présentés à l’Académie Royale des Sciences,” Vol. IX. 1780, p. 262;
Hanow, in Joh. Dan. Titius’s “Gemeinützige Abhand. über natür. Dinge,”
1768, p. 102), and, with reference to the Herschels he thus expresses
himself: “If electricity, moving in currents, develops magnetic forces,
and if, in accordance with an early hypothesis of Sir Wm. Herschel
(_Phil. Trans._ for 1795, Vol. LXXXV. p. 318; John Herschel,
“Outlines of Astronomy,” p. 238; also, Humboldt, “Cosmos,” Vol. I. p.
189), the sun itself is in the condition of a perpetual northern light
(I should rather say of an electro-magnetic storm) we should seem
warranted in concluding that solar light transmitted in the regions of
space by vibrations of ether, may be accompanied by electro-magnetic
currents” (“Dict. of Nat. Biog.,” for John and William Herschel, Vol.
XXVI. pp. 263–274).
REFERENCES.--Larousse, “Dict. Univ.,” Vol. IX. p. 397; Wolf,
“Hist. Ordbog.,” Vol. VII. pp. 194–199; Nyerup, “Univ. Annalen”;
Houzeau et Lancaster, “Bibliographie,” 1882, Vol. II. p. 166.
Three of the children of Peter Horrebow, almost equally distinguished
for their learning, are: Nicolas Horrebow (1712–1760), who made
physical and astronomical observations in Iceland and published an
able report thereon during 1752; Christian Horrebow (1718–1776), who
succeeded his father in 1753 as astronomer in the Copenhagen University
and who wrote several important scientific treatises; and Peter
Horrebow (1728–1812), who was professor of mathematics and philosophy,
and published works on geometry, meteorology and astronomy.
Much of interest concerning the above will also be found in the
“Abstracts of Papers ... Roy Soc.,” Vol. II. pp. 208, 249, 251, and in
the “Catalogue of Sc. Papers ... Roy. Soc.,” Vol. III. pp. 322–328;
Vol. VI. p. 687; Vol. VII. p. 965.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account