Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
REFERENCES.--“Dict. of Nat. Biog.,” London, 1888, Vol. XVI. pp.
216–220; Ritter’s “Geschichte der Philosophie”; Dr. Friedrich
Ueberweg, “History of Philosophy,” tr. by Geo. S. Morris, New
York, 1885, Vol. I. pp. 452–457; Larousse, “Dict. Univ.,” Vol.
VI. p. 1398, containing an extensive list of references; Alfred
Weber, “History of Philosophy,” New York, 1896, pp. 246–252
(tr. of Frank Thilly); “Biog. Gén.,” Vol. XV. pp. 256–257; “La
Grande Encycl.,” Vol. XV. pp. 71–72; Pluanski, “Thèse sur Duns
Scot,” Paris, 1887; “The Great Schoolmen of the Middle Ages,”
W. J. Townsend, London, 1881, “Duns Scotus,” Chap. XV.; J. B.
Hauréau, “La Philosophie Scholastique,” Paris, 1850, Vol. II.
pp. 307–417. Consult also the biographies written by Ferchius,
Berti, Caveili and Veglensis, and, for a complete exposition
of his system, C. Werner, “Die Scholastik des Späteren
Mittelalters,” Vienna, 1881, Vol. I; “Illustrations of the
History of Medieval Thought,” by R. L. Poole, London, 1884.
=A.D. 1254.=--Bacon (Roger), “the most remarkable man in the most
remarkable century of the Middle Ages” (E. H. Plumptre, 1866),
sometimes called Friar Bacon (1214–1294), a Franciscan monk of
Ilchester, who devoted himself to the study of science at Oxford and
Paris and “whose deep penetration into the mysteries of nature justly
entitled him to the appellation of “The Wonderful Doctor,” treats of
the magnet and of its properties at pp. 383–384 of his “Opus Minus” (J.
S. Brewer, “Fr. R. Bacon,” London, 1859), and dwells upon the loadstone
as a _miraculum in parte notum_.
Bacon is also the author of many other works, the most important of
which are his “Opus Majus” and “Opus Tertium” (first published in
English respectively in 1733 and 1859), the last named having been
originally written out for Pope Clement IV and intended to serve as a
preamble to the “Opus Minus” and “Opus Majus,” although it was later
than either in the date of its composition (Brewer, _op. cit._ p.
xliv). Leland has said that it is easier to collect the leaves of the
Sybil than the titles of all of Bacon’s works. At pp. 218–222, Vol.
III. of the ninth edition “Encyclopædia Britannica” will be found a
synopsis of the six parts into which Jebb divided the “Opus Majus”
(pronounced by Whewell “at once the Encyclopædia and the Organum of
the thirteenth century”), and likewise an account of his other works,
besides numerous references to leading authorities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account