Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
It has been found that every human female has 3600 eggs and every
male liberates 2,500,000 sperm at a time. Now, if the “right of the
child to be born” means anything at all it must mean, then, the right
of the egg to be fertilized, for it does not become a child until it
does. Which, then, gentlemen, is the sacred egg? I would say that it
is that egg which is fertilized at a time when both parents are in a
position to give it a square deal; to give the child food, care, and
the sort of environment which goes to the making of a decent American
citizen.
I say again, we have no antagonism to the churches. The scientist
would simply like to be left free to investigate his material and to
put it at the disposal of all the American people, without church
interference. We simply want the American people trusted with the
best information that we can give them about this matter; that all,
not some, may have the right to use it or not, as they see fit.
_Mrs. Benjamin Carpenter_ showed how the precedent of the Federal law
had been utilized by the courts to suppress the Parenthood Clinic in
Chicago, even though Illinois has no State law prohibiting the giving
of verbal information, as elsewhere described in this book. Her closing
words were:
I ask you, gentlemen, is it not a shameful thing that when women are
anxious to have children, and ask only for information as to how to
space their children so that they can recover from one pregnancy
before they are plunged into another one; or when they feel that
they have had all the children they can possibly bring up as good
citizens—and it is the women who bear the children—they want
information, and it is refused them; in this twentieth century is it
not shameful that any scientific information should be classed as
obscene?
The point of view of the eugenicist was vigorously upheld by _Prof.
Roswell Johnson_ of Pittsburgh University, formerly investigator in
experimental evolution for Carnegie Institute, and teacher of biology
in the University of Wisconsin and Harvard University:
I wish to call your attention to the very great importance of this
legislation for the future American racial composition. In my opinion
only the immigration law and the projects for international comity
can compare with this bill in so far as they affect the future of
this American stock.
There are two kinds of children—welcome children and unwelcome
children. This bill will reduce to an important extent the number of
unwelcome children. It will increase to a considerable extent the
number of welcome children.
Now, if the individual himself will cooperate in this matter, why
should we not seize on that opportunity?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account