Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
_Mr. Major_: But they do not have many children. I can remember my
grandmother and her three sisters, four women married before they
were 18, who raised over 11 children and lived to be over 80 years
of age. There are seven in my family. I have a daughter with two
children. If it keeps on, her daughter will not have any children.
That looks to be the trouble; the people that ought to have children
do not. A bill like this, to put this information around in news
stands, where it can be picked up anywhere, as these women say, I do
not know how you feel about it, but I have always felt the very fear
of consequences. I have felt that it would promote immorality.
I want to say another thing to you, Doctor. I was State’s attorney
in my court and my county, which is one of the best in the world,
for six years, and during that time I suspect I had at least four
seduction cases a year. There has not been a seduction case there now
for 20 years. That looks like this information is leaking out in some
way.
_Dr. Litchfield_: It is not getting in the right hands.
_Mr. Major_: It is getting out. I do not think human nature is
changing, but those cases are only heard of when there is pregnancy
in a seduction case, and there has not been a seduction case there
for 20 years. When you go into different courts you do not hear
of it, and it used to be of frequent occurrence, and the only
explanation in my mind is that these people are securing from some
source the knowledge to prevent conception, and the effect of it is
that the people that ought to be having families, and I mean like
the lady that spoke this morning—my idea about the best people in
this country is that they should not bring up one or two spindley
children that do not know how to take care of themselves. They do
not have families any more where the girls hand down one dress to
another. That is past in this country.
(The English in the above is unedited. It is reprinted exactly as it
appears in the government report of the Hearing.)
_Dr. Litchfield_: I agree; but for every case of seduction there
are over 100 cases of worthy, industrious, virtuous, loving mothers
who are having their children too close together, and if they had
the knowledge to space their children and conserve their own health
it would be better than to raise such terribly big families and
themselves be broken down in middle life by too frequent pregnancy.
We are not working for the profligate who becomes easily seduced and
becomes pregnant. They are an inconsiderable number compared with
the worthy people that should have the protection that science can
give them. The enormous number of women who die before middle life on
account of too frequent pregnancy, whose health is broken down, so
that they leave a large family of motherless children, could be done
away with.
_Mr. Yates_: Does that frequently occur?
_Dr. Litchfield_: Yes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account