Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
Senator Cummins, then Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said
he would call for a vote of the Committee on the bill at any time
before the end of the session if a majority were willing to vote
for a favorable report. It would require nine votes to win the
report. The plan adopted was an unusual and informal one, a sort
of layman-citizen’s way of cutting through the tangle of business.
There were but twenty-six days left in the session including Sundays.
The carrying out of this plan was described as follows in The Birth
Control Herald (March 10, 1925) under these headlines: “A Mental Daily
Dozen Prescribed for the Judiciary Committee by the V. P. L. as an
Aid to Action on Cummins-Vaile Bill; Method Urged as Congressional
Minute-Saver in Legislative Rush Toward Close of Session”:
Not to Walter Camp’s records, but to the tune of facts and reasoning
arranged by the Voluntary Parenthood Director, the members of the
Judiciary Committee in both Senate and House, were urged to stimulate
healthy thought on the Cummins-Vaile Bill, with a view to reaching
a Committee decision by the time the twelfth mental exercise was
finished.
This dozen of “setting up” exercises were prescribed as an aid toward
overcoming the paralysis of the reasoning faculties, induced by
the embarrassment of sex consciousness, which seem to rise to the
surface in the minds of most of the members, when dealing with the
“birth control” bill.
The “dozen” consisted of a daily sequence of notes to each member,
each note covering a single point for the bill, and so short
that it would take no more than two minutes to read. The plan
was offered as a first aid to minute-saving in the legislative
rush toward the close of the session. One reason a day keeps the
“no-time-for-consideration” argument away. There are spare minutes
despite the legislative jam,—observation from the galleries proves
it, says Director Dennett, after her long experience in watching
the members of Congress write, talk with each other, swap jokes, or
have forty winks, while their colleagues deliver themselves of their
views, at great length on the floor.
The twelve notes are given below. To save space the introductory and
closing words of each note are omitted.
February 6, 1925.
_POINT ONE._—Accepting the probability that there will not be time,
before the close of the present session, to have the Cummins-Vaile
Bill discussed at length, either in the Judiciary Committee or on
the floor, we are asking each member of the Judiciary Committee
to consider _informally_, the very few simple points in the bill,
with a view to securing, if possible, a vote in committee without
appreciable debate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account