Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
_d._ Even if the assumption were tenable that most young women are
“straight” through fear only, the indictment would fall primarily on
the parents, clergy and teachers who would have to stand convicted
of failure as sources of education, example and inspiration. Can
any member of Congress seriously hold an utter distrust of the
educational and moral facts in our civilization?
As an opportunity for clean faith in the people this bill is
unexcelled. Can you be counted on to be one who will meet it squarely?
February 20, 1925.
_POINT TWELVE._—It has been repeatedly stated by many members of
Congress that the main reason why action on the bill has been delayed
is because of distaste for legislating on any subject that brings
sex considerations to mind. Granted the existence of a certain
embarrassment, does the Judiciary Committee wish any longer to stand
before the public as a body which will permit embarrassment to
displace reason and responsibility to the people?
Members have told us that dread of being conspicuous in this matter
has inhibited them. Such feeling is somewhat natural, and may have
been more or less excusable as a reason for not acting when this
legislation was first proposed in 1919. But now in view of all the
data submitted, the long delay, and the fact that no substantial
arguments against the bill have been advanced by anyone, is it not
time to cast aside feeling and let common sense win? “Eventually, why
not now?”
We wish to honor each member of the Committee with the assumption
that he will prefer to base his stand upon a courageous sense
of decency and justice to the people, rather than on either
embarrassment or fear.
Regardless of whether there may or may not be opportunity for action
on the Floor during the session, are you not willing now to state
whether, in your individual opinion, the bill should have at least
favorable report from the committee on the merit of the question?
We respectfully request your statement as to what your own stand is,
and enclose for your convenience, a slip and an addressed envelope.
If our twelve points for the bill, which have been submitted in
single notes since February 6th, are not now at hand, and you wish
duplicates of any or all of them for review, we will gladly supply
them on your request. The series will be made public, together with a
report on the stand of the members of the Committee.
_The Enclosure_:
I stand for a favorable report on the Cummins-Vaile Bill (S. 2290
H. R. 6542).
I am opposed to a favorable report on the Cummins-Vaile Bill (S.
2290 H. R. 6542).
I am not ready to state my stand on the Cummins-Vaile Bill (S. 2290
H. R. 6542).
(Kindly mark which line represents your opinion.)
Signed .......................
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account