Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
However, circumstances being as they were, there was no choice but to
adjust as might be to them, and antidote, as rapidly and thoroughly
as possible, the prejudices which had been established. The writer’s
first experience in trying to do this was in Albany, when one of the
evasive legislators had suggested conferring with a leading official in
the State Health Department. The latter was not averse to the idea of
a revision of the Comstock law. In fact he admitted all the arguments.
But he was adamant when it came to recommending the Legislature to
act; for he could not make himself disassociate the reasons for the
repeal from his violent prejudice against the “wild” words and actions
of the birth control advocates. The things he “knew” about Mrs. Sanger
far exceeded anything the facts warranted: he had not stopped to find
out the truth, but had a settled conviction that could not be budged,
until at the very end of an hour’s earnest talk, when he managed to
admit that the proposition to revise the laws should be considered on
its own merit, regardless of anything else.
Similarly in Washington, when various members of Congress cited the
“wild radicals” who had “agitated about this thing,” they had to be
laboriously diverted to the consideration of the fact that there was
nothing wild at all about the control of parenthood, that the most
conservative classes were those who had achieved it first and most,
and that Congress was being asked only to correct Comstock’s blunder
of banning science along with indecency, so that the law would reflect
the belief and practice of the educated normal men and women of the
country. It was far slower and harder work than it would otherwise
have been, just because of the “fighting” psychology which had been
established in the birth control movement.
All of which leads to the second part of the answer to the question as
to why Congress has been so slow to act, and that is, that the group
working for the Cummins-Kissel and Cummins-Vaile Bills did not have
adequate funds for the constructive publicity work necessary to offset
the prejudices and dissipate the inhibitions of the members of Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account