Dr. George Blumer, of New Haven, Conn.—“It is better to enlighten people by education than by legislation. I do not feel as a matter of principle that the regulation of birth control should be entirely in the hands of physicians ... there are many cases where the problem is not a medical one at all.” Dr. Jerome Cook of St. Louis.—“No distinction should be made between this and other forms of medical knowledge, and no restriction should be placed upon the spread of knowledge....” Dr. Alexander Forbes of Harvard Medical School.—“The one thing I feel sure of is that the principle in the present law, classifying contraceptive knowledge as obscenity, is essentially hypocritical and unsound.” Dr. A. B. Emmons 2nd, of Harvard Medical School.—“Education rather than water-tight legislation. Censorship of manufactured articles. A few good popular articles of sound advice and vigorous warning against dangers and quacks by leading medical authorities is about all that can be done. I believe in leading rather than prohibiting.” Dr. Alma Arnold of New York.—“Enlightenment by education rather than by new laws. We have too many laws now. Logic and education of the individual must take the place of snoopery by appointed guardians.” Dr. Charles S. Bacon of Chicago. “Any attempt to limit the teaching of contraception to a class will be, I think, useless. Worthless drugs and appliances will probably disappear in the course of time, because of disappointments resulting from their use. If laws regulating the sale of poisons do not suffice, they should be amended.” Dr. J. E. Wallin, Director of Clinic for Subnormal and Delinquent Children, Miami University, Ohio.—“I am unalterably opposed to any sort of monopoly limited to any particular type of practitioner ... who would be in a position to extort unreasonable fees.” Dr. B. S. Oppenheimer, of Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York.—“No restrictive laws would work, and the education of the public by the medical profession is the only way to get bad methods suppressed and good ones adopted.”