Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
There are many indications that medical men have an instinct for
protecting the status of the profession as the natural source of
scientific information on this subject, and it is not exceptional to
find physicians who lean toward favoring a “doctors only” bill as
a recognition of medical prestige, but this impulse is not at all
synonymous with a mercenary desire to have exclusive control of the
dissemination of knowledge. They quite naturally want credit for
devising good contraceptive methods, but relatively few are interested
to retain any monopolistic advantage in the utilization of them. The
writer recalls a conversation with a physician who, after some years
of experiment, had devised an extremely simple and very inexpensive
contraceptive. His rather inexplicable reservations in talking about
it led to the frank inquiry as to whether he planned to make money by
controlling the sale of his compound. His answer was a most emphatic
“No, certainly not.” But he added, “I do, however, want credit for it.
I have worked on this thing for five years, and have proved that it
is simple, harmless, efficacious and cheap. It has solved the problem
for my own patients and will do the same for thousands of others. All
I want is that the formula shall stand as a part of my professional
record.” He solidly approves the freedom idea in legislation.
CHAPTER II
WHAT DO THE PEOPLE WANT?
_People’s first individual want is reliable contraceptive
information: Strong probability that people prefer decent enforceable
laws to those which are dirty and unenforceable: Choice can not be
put up to United States town-meeting fashion: Reader asked to make
own choice by elimination of what he does not want: Do you consider
contraception indecent? Should laws penalize the decent majority to
reach the depraved few? Should the control of conception itself be
made a criminal act by law? Abstinence as method of birth control has
no legal standing in the U. S.: Do you want unenforceable laws? Can
“doctors only” laws accomplish their own aims? Are they enforceable?
Do all contraceptives require personal medical instruction?
Proponents of “doctors only” bill admit they do not: English birth
control organization disapproves “doctors only” stand: Best known
English authority on birth control is biologist, not M.D.: Are laws
to control improper advertising of contraceptives practicable?
Average citizen too occupied to analyze legislative proposals:
Proponents of limited legislation backward about explaining their
bills to the public: They refuse to debate openly or confer privately
with the proponents of the freedom bill._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account