Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
Do you, by any chance, think that the control of conception regardless
of any connection with obscenity, should _itself be declared by law
to be a criminal act_? This is a crucial question absurd as it may
sound. There are many people who believe that the scientific control
of parenthood is wrong, though not necessarily obscene. This has been
the teaching of the Catholic Church, and on this ground Catholics
have opposed the repeal of the legal ban on knowledge concerning it.
They have not asked Congress to amend the Comstock law by making
it a criminal act to control conception. But is not this the only
logical thing for them to do, if they presume to, ask the government
to continue to deny people access to the knowledge on the ground that
the utilization of the knowledge is wrong? Ought not they and any
others who are like-minded, to get themselves together and tackle this
question straight from the shoulder in Congress? If they consider it
at all appropriate to appear at a Hearing and urge Congress to try to
keep the people from knowing about this wrong thing, is it not more
fitting to ask for laws which will forbid the thing itself, instead
of knowledge about the thing? They can perfectly well proceed on this
course if they wish to undertake it. It is noteworthy that thus far,
none of them have done so. No one has gone to Congress and pointed with
pride to that unique statute in Connecticut, the only one of its sort
in the world—which makes it a crime to control conception—and asked
to have a Federal law of the same sort enacted. But if the Catholics
and what few other opponents there are, do not wish to undertake this
task, and if they persist in asking for laws to prevent others from
learning how to do what they—the Catholics, et al., consider wrong,
they will be treading upon ground which may menace the maintenance of
their own liberty to teach and preach and practice what they believe
to be right. The tables are likely to be turned upon them, so that
they will have to fight for the same sort of liberty which they now
seek to deny to others. Indeed this is what did happen in the case of
the Oregon School law, which would be in operation today if the United
States Supreme Court had not declared it unconstitutional. (Appendix
No. 15 gives further information on this subject.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account