Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
Of these, 13 were employed as stenographers or book-keepers, 7 were
employed as teachers, 5 were still students, 5 were in social work, 6
were employed by the day, cleaning and doing housework.
In almost every case, the women were working to support their families
because their husbands were either ill, or drank, or gambled. In a few
cases the young couple were just married and living in one or two rooms
and were both obliged to work in order to support themselves and of
course felt that they must postpone all thought of children until they
had saved enough to take care of them.
It is impossible to classify the occupation of the husbands. They cover
practically every employment:
Engineer
Laborer
Carpenter
Bank Cashier
Gambler
Minister
Musician
Switchman
Teamster
Watchman
Lawyer
Coal-miners, etc.
These people have come to us from many sources:
282 through the newspapers
54 from the United Charities
36 from the Infant Welfare Society
80 from Social Agencies, Settlements, Dispensaries, Doctors, etc.
48 from friends and patients.
Of the women, 252 have used some forms of contraceptive, some of them
harmful, most of them useless. Many have resorted to abortion. The
reasons given for wishing information are as difficult to classify as
are the occupations of the men. In almost every case, the foundation of
the trouble is economic but there are usually other complications. For
instances:
Four children in four years.
Instrumental deliveries—contracted pelvis and goitre.
Caesarean operation always necessary.
Wants to wait until stronger before having any more.
Wants children but husband is just starting in business.
Six children—all tubercular.
No home, husband traveling musician.
Nine miscarriages in ten years—retroversion—cannot carry to term.
It is also very interesting to note that we have had five cases of
sterility, the women willing to do anything if only they might have
children.
But it means very little to read a list of reasons like this—too many
factors enter into each individual case and perhaps the only way to
get a real picture of the situation is to have a little story of some
of these family tragedies. The cases divide quite sharply into three
classes:
I. Young women just married who wish to postpone having children for
a few years until they can make a home.
II. Cases in which the health of either husband or wife makes
children impossible.
III. Those many cases of too large families and
too little money to take care of them.
Here is _Case No. 88_—Referred—Newspaper.
The man is 59 years old, a cashier. The woman 39 years old, married
at 37, Swedish-Protestant. Has had one child. Reason for wishing
information is, that she has nephritis, had a difficult labor and
convulsions and was unconscious for five days. The baby died at birth.
_Case No. 451_—Referred by Mental Hygiene Society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account