Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
_Sen. Stanley_: “Both. I maintain that it is not necessary to show
that it is unconstitutional, because of its folly and its unwisdom.
It is absolutely a violation of the spirit of the Constitution.”
_Sen. Sterling_: “If you think race-track gambling is an evil, do you
think that advice or suggestions in regard to wagers and bets should
be prevented?”
_Sen. Stanley_: “May I answer that question by asking another? Does
the Chairman believe that the Federal government should pass a law
prohibiting anything that is morally or industrially wrong?”
_Sen. Sterling_: “Oh no, there are limitations of course upon the
power of the Federal government to do those things.”
_Sen. Stanley_: “Yes, ... I had begun to doubt it.”
_Sen. Sterling_: “This prohibits the use of the mails for certain
purposes.”
_Sen. Stanley_: “Yes.”
_Sen. Sterling_: “And we have passed laws relative to the use of the
mails ... prohibiting certain written or printed matter....”
_Sen. Stanley_: “And Mr. Chairman, that is the worst vice, the worst
phase of this legislative itch with which the country is infected,
for the Federal and sumptuary regulation of all the activities of the
people, moral, intellectual and industrial. It is gaining. One bad
law breeds a million.”
_Sen. Borah_: “Well, Mr. Stanley, you do not have to make any
argument to me that we have no power to establish a censorship.”
_Sen. Stanley_: “This is as fine an instance, Mr. Chairman, as I
know, of the abortive birth and progress of this character of half
baked legislation. A bill, honest, and perhaps advised in the main,
was introduced.... As it passed a Representative took a shot at it on
the fly and inserted this section 5. The Postmaster General (Hays)
in a letter to Chairman Nelson of this Committee very pertinently
observed: ‘This particular section 5 makes it an offense for
newspapers to publish racing news. I favor the bill, but am opposed
to this section 5. I was not consulted about it, and I hope this
section does not pass. The whole bill had better be defeated in my
opinion, than to add this additional curtailment of the freedom of
the press. There has been a very strong tendency of late in that
direction, and I am sure it is essential that such tendency be
checked. I am reminded of Voltaire’s statement, “I wholly disapprove
what you say and will defend with my life your right to say it.”’”
_Sen. Borah_: “It is not necessary to proceed any further then, is
it?”
_Sen. Stanley_: “Senator, I think there is more in this than this
bill. I have no fear that this bill will pass. This is too much.
Neither the minds nor the stomachs of the people are prepared to
endure it. But I wish to emphasize its evils in order that this
character of legislation may be discouraged, that this persistent and
pernicious effort to control the freedom of the press may find an end
somewhere at some time.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account