Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
They mostly ask the same questions and voice the same fears about
removing the law which tries (so vainly) to suppress birth control
information.
They say, “Yes, but if everybody knows how to avoid having children,
there won’t be any children!”
Then we carefully iron out their fears by showing them that
prophecies as to how it _might_ work out are not worth so much as
testimony on how it _does_ work out. We tell them of Holland and New
Zealand, the two prize birth control countries of the world,—how
Holland has had a ratio of increase in population next to that of
Germany and Russia—that New Zealand is a garden country for babies,
that they make a fine art of motherhood there, with their wonderful
chain of maternity hospitals, and that Holland and New Zealand have
the lowest general and baby death rates in the world.
With the race suicide bogey out of the way, they go on to their
next fear, which is that there will be a terrifying drop in moral
standards if contraceptive information is easily available. Then
again we reassure them by citing the other countries which have no
shocking repressive laws like ours, but which nevertheless do not
show any records of general promiscuity and unbridled excess, or of
sexual laxity among the young. We go further, and remind them that
if it be true that the mass of our American young people would have
so little moral anchorage that we should fear to trust them with
knowledge, then something is awfully the matter with us of the older
generations who have reared them, and that it is for us to hasten to
develop a keener sense of responsibility for the education of _all_
young people, as well as those of our families. And they all respond
to this appeal. They would obviously feel ashamed not to.
Another idea they advance with confidence is that “practically
everyone can now get the information who really wants it.” And we
reply, “Well if that be true, and the law is already so much of a
dead letter as that, then why hesitate a moment to repeal it?” But
we tell them, of course, that it is not true that everyone has the
information who wants it, as is proven by the incessant stream of
desperate, ill and unhappy people who clamor for it, also that much
of the information which is now illegally and secretly circulated,
especially that which is verbal, is inadequate, unscientific and
even harmful, and that it is bound to be so till the medical schools
include this subject in their curricula and until the doctors can
give the information without evading the laws.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account