Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
By far the most significant bit of experience gleaned from the
legislative effort of that year was what one of the more thoughtful
members of the New York Legislature said, when he was asked to consider
introducing the bill. “Why do you come up here asking us to consider
a bill of this sort when our National laws set us the example they
do on this subject? You say yourself that Congress decided that
this information was not ‘fit to print’; very well then, go down to
Washington and get Congress to reverse itself, and then you will have
a talking point when you come to us.” It may have been merely his
particularly clever form of excuse for not doing anything, but there
is no gainsaying that he hit upon a rather unanswerable point. It was
undeniably true that the action of Congress in passing the Comstock
bill in 1873 had influenced practically all of the States to follow
suit. The fact that the New York law on this subject preceded that
of Congress by a year, only indicates that Anthony Comstock happened
to live and do his work in New York. Both he and his biographer, the
Rev. C. G. Trumbull, said emphatically that his campaign of suppression
would have been a relatively futile effort without a comprehensive
Federal law. Comstock used keen sense when he determined to secure not
only the particular power to suppress the transportation of obscene
literature that a Federal law would give, but also the very great
impetus to his whole campaign which the Federal example would stimulate
in the States, for further means of suppression.
The seed thus planted bore fruit within three months, by the
organization of a new association, the Voluntary Parenthood League, the
immediate object of which was the repeal of the Federal prohibition.
And within six months the Congressional work was started in Washington.
The story of the Federal bill is however the subject of the next
chapter.
The purpose of this chapter is to survey the attempts at State
legislation which have been made both before and after the work on the
Federal bill was begun, and to make an appraisal of their value toward
the securing of freedom of access to contraceptive knowledge.
More endeavors have been made in New York than in any other State.
The efforts which preceded the campaign for the Federal bill have
already been noted. Following that time, Committees, acting under the
leadership of Mrs. Sanger, went to Albany, during the legislative
sessions of 1921, 1923, 1924 and 1925. Bills were introduced in the
three latter years, and the ones introduced in 1923 and 1925 reached
the stage of a Hearing. No bill came to a vote on the floor of either
the Senate or the Assembly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account