Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
The effort to put Virginia into the black list of states which prohibit
contraceptive knowledge and means, was a very recent one. In the
legislative session of 1924 a bill was introduced which, according
to the _Birth Control Review_, would make it “unlawful to sell, give
away or possess any appliance or instrument for the prevention of
conception.” The Committee on Moral and Social Welfare to which it was
referred received many protests. So also did the sponsor of the bill,
Mr. Ozlin, with the result that he withdrew it from the calendar,
before it was discussed at all in the House.
In Pennsylvania there have been two attempts to make the law more
suppressive than it already was, which was quite bad enough, for
Pennsylvania is one of the states which make it a crime to tell
any one, to have in one’s possession, to publish or to advertise
contraceptive information, and it prohibits the circulation of
contraceptive means. The first effort was in 1917, the Stern bill,
which far surpassed any previous legislation in comprehensive
suppression, for it even prohibited “attempting to impart” any
“knowledge or information _tending_ to interfere with or diminish the
birth of human beings.” If opinions have differed widely as to what
constituted obscenity, fancy how they would differ on what “tended”
to diminish human birth. Isador Stern, the sponsor of the bill, told
Mrs. Alice Field Newkirk of the Main Line Birth Control League, that
he wanted to “make it impossible to discuss birth control anywhere in
Pennsylvania,—in parlors or in public halls.” The bill was quietly
moved along through legislative routine till it passed both houses
and it was not until the eleventh hour that many people knew of its
existence. Then protests began to pour in to Governor Martin Brumbaugh,
urging him to veto it. This he did with a very strong and forthright
letter, in which he called it “one of the most reactionary enactments
attempted in years.” The veto is here given in full, as it contains
several points of importance in considering the question as to what
kind of laws on this subject Americans may want:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
_Executive Chamber_
HARRISBURG, JULY 16, 1917.
I file herewith, in the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth,
with my objection, House Bill No. 1643, entitled “An act forbidding
the advertising, publishing, selling, distribution, or otherwise
disseminating or imparting, or attempting to disseminate or impart,
knowledge or information tending to interfere with or diminish the
birth of human beings in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; defining
it as a misdemeanor and defining its punishment.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account