Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
What is chiefly in the mind of the legislators is not the terms of the
bill at all, but the thought, “What will it do to me and my career if I
have anything to do with such an embarrassing subject as this?” These
reactions are admitted as true and are so reported, even by those who
have been working for the limited legislation. For instance, in the
_Birth Control Review_ of May 1921, the “Legislative Committee formed
by the Margaret Sanger group to push a measure or amendment affecting
the present birth control laws in the State of New York” reported their
effort to secure a sponsor for the “doctors only” bill drafted by
Professor Lindsay. The report reads in part, as follows: “The Chairman
of the Health Committee seemed the most logical and best informed man
to approach and he was also a member of the medical profession. He
stated his absolute opposition to the repeal or amendment of the Birth
Control laws and his determination to fight any such measure.”
So the “Doctors only” concession was quite wasted on him. The report
continues: “Several of the important men of the Assembly assured us
of their approval of this class of legislation, but did not care to
introduce the amendment.”
The “doctors only” bait did not tempt them either. But hope was
rewarded, the report says, for
On a second visit to Albany, W. F. Clayton of Brooklyn expressed
his approval and belief in the great benefit of such measure.... He
would sponsor the amendment he said.... After three weeks’ delay and
two more visits to Albany, a letter was received from him saying: “I
very much regret, but after consulting with some of the leaders of
the Assembly, I have been strongly advised not to offer your bill. I
am told it would do me an injury that I could not overcome for some
time. Now, while I am more or less in favor of your bill and if you
can get someone else to favor it, and they are able to get the bill
out of Committee, I am strongly inclined to think that I would be one
to vote for it, providing it had a ghost of a show. I regret that I
have had this bill so long, but I sincerely hope my keeping the bill
this length of time will not in any way prevent you from finding
someone to introduce it.”
So the “doctors only” idea was no help here. The report proceeds:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account