Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
with straight repeal bills, is dabbing at a national blemish instead of
wiping it out. All of which considerations point directly to the need
for Federal legislation.
CHAPTER III
GOING TO THE POINT WITH A FEDERAL BILL
_1919 sees first concerted effort to repeal Federal law: Initiated
by Voluntary Parenthood League, an outgrowth of National Birth
Control League: Disbanding of earlier organization and merging of
forces: Opposition from birth control advocates on “doctors only”
basis arises later: The long hunt for a sponsor: Cummins-Kissel
Bill introduced in January, 1923: Re-introduced in next Congress
as Cummins-Vaile Bill: Survey of six-year struggle in Congress:
Significant characteristics of Congressional reaction: Fear and
embarrassment inhibit even those in favor of measure: Suggestions
for keeping repeal “dark”: Alternate appeals to logic and humanity:
Public opposition (mostly Catholic) relatively slight: Sponsor in
Senate received 20 letters for bill to every one against._
The chief answer to the query “What changes in the laws have been
proposed?” is that in the summer of 1919 a major move toward redeeming
the whole United States from the Comstock blunder of 1873 was made by
taking the question to Congress and demanding a repeal of the words
“preventing conception” from the five Federal obscenity statutes
wherever they occur. This move was the culmination of four years of
agitational, educational, experimental and more or less handicapped
work, first by the National Birth Control League, and then by the
Voluntary Parenthood League, which was started in the spring of 1919,
with the primary aim of accomplishing this federal action. As described
in the previous chapter, the experience for two years with efforts at
State legislation was sufficient to demonstrate clearly that the one
time-saving, fundamental act was the revision of the Federal laws on
which all State laws were modelled, and which was originally and has
ever since been the legal source of the disrepute in which the subject
of birth control has been held.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account