Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
A few weeks of quiet but energetic sampling of senatorial opinions
brought us to the point of choosing as the desired sponsor one of the
only two physicians of the Senate, a man who had heartily indorsed
the bill from the beginning and whose cultured dignity would insure
right handling for the measure. But it took him nearly three months
to reach the conclusion that he was too occupied with other important
issues to do this measure justice. Even then he did not refuse, but
merely said he could not yet see his way and urged that someone
else be asked. This refusal to refuse has been characteristic of
nearly all the fifteen Senators who have been invited in succession
to sponsor the bill. All of them believed in it, but in their
various ways, they have “passed the buck”—some convincingly, some
transparently, some gracefully, some awkwardly, but all of them
insistent that it was a job better suited to someone else.
Several were “too busy”—among these was one who was not a member of
any major committee, who had introduced no public-interest bills, and
who, as observed from the Senate gallery, sits for hours on end in
undisturbed quiet. One assured us he was “too old,” another was sure
he was “too ignorant of the subject—it needs a man who can give all
the data in debate, as I can’t.” We promised him a perfect arsenal
of material all classified and condensed, but he felt sure he wasn’t
“equal to doing it well.” Another said he was interested, but better
not be the sponsor as—“well, candidly, I shall be up for re-election
next year, and you see, ...”
And still another who is considered one of the pillars of the major
party in Congress, a physically big man, standing something like six
feet three, announced to the relatively small woman who invited him
to render this bit of public service,—“Really, I’d be afraid to
introduce that sort of bill.” On being told that he “hardly looked
the part,” he spent an energetic five minutes trying to blot out the
picture of himself as a coward.
One man assured us that he was not “important enough in the Senate.
I don’t count,” he said. When the task was put up to one of the
_leading_ men, his answer was, “What you need for sponsor of a bill
of this sort is a man who isn’t active, someone who has nothing
to lose, someone whose bill wouldn’t be specially noticed.” Other
similar advice was to “get a lame duck to do it” in the short
session, that is some man who “is going out of politics anyway.” This
advice is a reminder of what Senator Thomas of Colorado said, in a
speech after his defeat, “the only independent Senators are those
just defeated or those just elected.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account