Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish themDennett, Mary Ware
History
Birth control laws : $b shall we keep them, change them, or abolish them
Dennett, Mary Ware
Birth control; Birth control -- Law and legislation -- United States
We asked what members were present and he told us frankly. So
we know who “faded away.” And we know who did not attend at all.
The nearest approach to an excuse that any had who were in favor
of the Bill, is that some of them were not present at the moment
that Senator Cummins announced that he would ask the vote of the
Committee. But they all knew beforehand from us that the Senator was
going to ask the vote on that day, so the record stands squarely as
one of evasion. It is quite true that most of the Judiciary members
were genuinely busy, some of them very busy during the last few weeks
of the session. But that five minutes could not have been found for
allowing the probable favorable majority to vote to report out the
Bill is taxing credulity farther than most people are willing to
stretch it.
Indeed Senator Cummins was quite candid in saying, “They simply
don’t want to vote on it.” We inquired if it was not chiefly because
the subject embarrassed them, and he assented. We discussed a bit
with him this curious fact that human sympathy did not overcome
embarrassment enough to just vote. We did not ask them to talk,
merely to act. The Senator granted that the effort had been very
educational. He added, “And, now as the farmers would say, you will
have to spit on your hands and go at it again. And next time you will
win.”
We asked Senator Dillingham if anything mitigating could be said
regarding the statement of Senator Cummins that the Judiciary members
had “faded away” when they knew the vote on the Bill was to be called
for. He said, “No, Senator Cummins was absolutely accurate. That is
what they did do, fade away. And yours was not the only Bill they
did that to either. They did it to some of mine also.” He said he
was very sorry for our disappointment, and that the postponement
was inevitable in view of the fact that they all had so many other
irons in the fire, each one having a lot of special interests of
his own that absorbed most of his time, and that on top of their
preoccupation with other matters was their sheer distaste for a Bill
of this nature.
We reminded both him and Senator Cummins that the “busy” excuse was
nothing new, that we had had that hurled at us at the very beginning
of the first session of the present Congress. But they both agreed
that with our bill introduced early in the next session and a Hearing
held we should be in a position to expect results in a fairly short
time. That many members of Congress anticipate the efficacy of our
persistence is indicated by a chance remark about another Bill that
was going hard, “Better get the birth control people to push it!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account