Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great ChancellorBusch, Moritz
History
Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great Chancellor
Busch, Moritz
Bismarck, Otto, Fürst von, 1815-1898
The conversation then turned on Vienna and Count Beust. The Chief said
Beust had apologised for the recent discourteous note. It was written
by Biegeleben, and not by himself. The reference to Biegeleben led
to the discussion of the Gagern family and to the once celebrated
Heinrich von Gagern (President of the Reichstag in the Paulskirche at
Frankfurt). “I remember,” the Chief said, “in 1850 or 1851, Manteuffel
was instructed to bring about an understanding between the Gagern and
the Conservative sections of the Prussian party--at least, as far as
the King was disposed to go in the cause of German unity. Manteuffel
selected Gagern and myself for this purpose, and so we were both
invited one day to a _souper à trois_ at his place. At first there was
little or no mention of politics, but Manteuffel afterwards made some
excuse for leaving us alone. When he left I immediately began to talk
politics, explaining my standpoint to Gagern in a plain, business-like
way. You should have heard Gagern! He assumed his Jove-like aspect,
lifted his eyebrows, ran his fingers through his hair, rolled his eyes
and cast them up to heaven so perpendicularly that you could hear the
joints in his neck crack, and poured out his grand phrases to me as if
I were a public meeting. Of course, that did not help him much with
me. I replied coolly, and we remained divided as before. When Jupiter
had retired, Manteuffel asked, ‘Well, what arrangement have you come to
together?’ ‘Oh,’ I replied, ‘no arrangement at all. The man is a fool.
He takes me for a public meeting! A mere watering-can of fine phrases!
Nothing can be done with him.’”
The subject of the bombardment having been introduced, the Chief said:
“I told the King again yesterday that it was time to begin, and he had
no objection to make. He replied that he had given orders to begin, but
that the generals said they could not. I know exactly how it is. It is
Stosch, Treskow, and Podbielski.”
Some one asked: “And Hindersin?”
“He is also against it,” said the Chief. “Podbielski” (so I understood
him to say) “could be brought round. But the other two are influenced
by considerations affecting their own future.”
It appeared from some further remarks of the Minister that, in his
opinion, first Queen Victoria, and then, at her instance the Crown
Princess, and, finally, the Crown Prince, persuaded by his consort,
will not have Paris bombarded; while the generals “cannot” bombard
the city out of consideration for the views of the Crown Prince, who
will, of course, be the future King, and will have the appointment of
Ministers of War, commandants of army corps, and field marshals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account