Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great ChancellorBusch, Moritz
History
Bismarck : $b some secret pages of his history (Vol. 1 of 3). Being a diary kept by Dr. Moritz Busch during twenty-five years' official and private intercourse with the great Chancellor
Busch, Moritz
Bismarck, Otto, Fürst von, 1815-1898
“The principal reason why the bombardment is delayed,” said the
Chancellor, “is the sentimentality of the Queen of England, and the
interference of Queen Augusta.... That seems to be a characteristic of
the Hohenzollerns--their women folk have always a great influence upon
them. It was not so with Frederick the Great, but with his successor
and the late King, as well as the present Most Gracious and his future
Majesty. The most curious example is that of Prince Charles, who is
anything but a good husband, and yet depends upon his wife, indeed he
is thoroughly afraid of her and is guided by her wishes.... But it is
somewhat different with these two (the King and the Crown Prince).
They want to be praised. They like to have it said in the English and
French press that they are considerate and generous. They find that the
Germans praise them enough as it is.”
It appears that Delbrück has not expressed himself very clearly in
his telegram respecting the prospect of the agreement with Bavaria
being sanctioned by the Diet. It seems as if there were not sufficient
members present to form the necessary quorum, and that it would be
opposed both by the Progressists and National Liberals. The Chief
observed: “So far as the Progressists are concerned, their conduct is
consistent. They wish to return to the state of affairs which prevailed
in 1849. But the National Liberals? If they will not have now what they
were striving for with all their might at the beginning of the year,
in February, and what it now depends upon them to secure, then we must
dissolve. The new elections will weaken the Progressist party still
more, and some of the National Liberals will also lose their seats.
But in that case the Treaties would not be completed. Bavaria would
reconsider the matter; Beust would put his finger in the pie, and we do
not know what the result would be. I cannot well go to Berlin. It is a
very uncomfortable journey and takes up a lot of time, and besides I am
really wanted here.”
Proceeding from this point the Minister spoke of the position of
affairs in 1848. “At that period the situation was for a long time very
favourable for the unification of Germany under Prussia. The smaller
Sovereigns were for the most part powerless and despondent. If they
could only save their money, their domains and their appropriations
they were prepared to consent to everything. The Austrians were
engaged with Hungary and Italy. The Tsar Nicholas would not have
intervened at that time. If they had only acted in a resolute way
previous to May, 1849, and come to terms with the smaller States they
would doubtless have carried the South with them, particularly if the
Würtemberg and Bavarian armies joined the Baden revolution, which
was not impossible at that stage. Time was lost, however, through
hesitation and half measures, and so the opportunity was thrown away.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account