Black and White: Land, Labor, and Politics in the SouthFortune, Timothy Thomas
History
Black and White: Land, Labor, and Politics in the South
Fortune, Timothy Thomas
African Americans -- Southern States; Southern States -- Economic conditions; United States -- Race relations
Here is a very significant fact also with regard to the
condition of our laborers in the South, and it shows one of
the disadvantages we have had to labor under. During the
war, and from the results of the war, nearly all of our
live stock was destroyed, a great portion of it was
destroyed, which left us after the war without the means of
raising our own meat and such supplies at home, and took
away from the South a great portion of our wealth, for we
know that cattle, hogs &c., increase in arithmetical
progress. If you have a hog, this year she bears so many
pigs, and in a couple of years those pigs bear so many, and
so on. But we were left without live stock. I have here a
table which shows, even under those difficulties, the
increase in that respect in the Southern States of live
stock. These are very significant figures. It is entirely an
accident that I happened to get hold of them last night. The
live stock of New York in 1870 was 5,286,421; in 1880,
5,422,238, an increase of 2 per cent. In Pennsylvania it was
4,484,748 in 1870; in 1880, 5,255,204, an increase of 17 per
cent. In Georgia, in 1870, it was 2,275,137; in 1880,
3,139,101, an increase of 38 per cent. In Alabama it was
1,606,299 in 1870, and in 1880, 2,586,221, an increase of 61
per cent, and in Mississippi, in 1870, it was 1,724,295, and
in 1880, 2,398,334, an increase of 38 per cent. This shows
that with all the disadvantages the South had to contend
with of their stock cattle being destroyed, the natural
advantages of climate and pasturage, to which I attribute
it, existing in the South have enabled them to increase more
rapidly their live stock than any other of the States of the
Union. That shows clearly the advantages which that country
offers for immigration and labor. This is an advantage to
labor. As I stated in my written reply to your submitted
questions, we work but few white laborers in my section of
the country. Why? Because they soon become land-owners with
the opportunities which present themselves to them. The
white men will not be there more than two or three years
before he has bought and paid for his land in almost every
instance.
By the CHAIRMAN:
Q. And he becomes an employer himself?
--A. He becomes an employer himself.
Q. Does he usually locate upon the plantation lands along
the rivers?
--A. No, sir; he cannot buy this land, because the planter
would not divide a large plantation into tracts; he would
not sell off a portion of his land without selling the
whole.
Q. In how large tracts are the plantations held? Just
mention the acreage of some of them that you are acquainted
with.
--A. I would say variously from 500 to 2,500 acres in
cultivation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account