Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 388, February 1848Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 388, February 1848
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
It is hardly necessary here to do more than remind our readers of the
great and generous effort made by this country for the abolition of
slavery in our colonies. For that purpose the nation agreed, without a
murmur, to pay the large sum of twenty millions sterling—a sacrifice to
principle and philanthropy which every one must allow to be unparalleled
in the annals of the world. At the same time we must not allow our
praise or admiration of this act to hurry us into extravagance or
exaggeration. The sum of twenty millions so granted was not a boon, but
merely compensation to a class of British subjects for the compulsory
surrender of a property which the law entitled them to hold. The
institution of slavery in the colonies, be it specially remembered, was
not the work of the planters, but of the British nation and crown. The
lands of Jamaica and other West Indian colonies were originally patented
on the special condition that they should be cultivated by slaves, for
the promotion of the national wealth; and the policy so originated was
continued under the sanction of laws equally sacred with those which
relate to any other species of property whatever. Nay, more, it was from
Jamaica, and not from the mother country, that the first proposals for a
partial suppression or cessation of the slave-trade proceeded. The
importations from Africa had become so great, that the people of that
colony requested that for some time the trade might be stopped; and
their petitions were rejected, on the ground that any such measure would
be injurious to the mercantile interests of England. But at last, to use
the words of the writer whom we have already quoted—
“The country became aware of the cruelty and injustice of that
infamous traffic, and abolished it. Years afterwards, she awoke as
from a dream, and began to abuse the planters for possessing slaves;
declared they had no right to hold them in bondage (although she
sold those slaves to them;) had them valued by commissioners whom
she appointed; paid eight shillings in the pound of this valuation,
and set them free, without any consideration whatever for the landed
property, buildings, and machinery, amounting to much more than the
aggregate price of the slaves, which were to be rendered useless and
valueless from want of labourers. The appraisement by those
commissioners, as directed by the Act, was based on the average
sales in each colony for eight years preceding the passing of the
bill, which was in 1833. The value of the slave property was thus
distinctly ascertained. The land, buildings, and machinery were not
taken into consideration, because neither the Parliament nor the
people admitted that they were to be placed in jeopardy by the
emancipation of the slaves. On the contrary, an opinion prevailed
that, with a free population, the planters would be more prosperous
than they had ever been.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account