True, she speaks of his being "full of the milk of human kindness." The words have become favourites with us, who are an affectionate and domestic people--and are lovingly applied to the loving; but Lady Macbeth attached no such profound sense to them as we do; and meant merely that she thought her husband would, after all, much prefer greatness unbought by blood; and, at the time she referred to, it is probable he would; but that she meant no more than that, is plain from the continuation of her praise, in which her ideas get not a little confused; and her words, interpret them as you will, leave nothing "milky" in Macbeth at all. Milk of human kindness, indeed! TALBOYS. "What thou would'st highly, That would'st thou holily; would'st not play false, And yet would'st wrongly win: thou'dst have great Glamis, That which cries, 'Thus thou must do, if thou have it; And that which rather thou dost fear to do Than wishest should be undone.'" _That_ is her Ladyship's notion of the "milk of human kindness"! "I wish somebody would murder Duncan--as for murdering him myself, I am much too tender-hearted and humane for perpetrating such cruelty with my own hand!" BULLER. Won't you believe a Wife to be a good judge of her Husband's disposition? NORTH. Not Lady Macbeth. For does not she herself tell us, at the same time, that he had formerly schemed how to commit Murder? BULLER. Gagged again. NORTH. I see no reason for doubting that she was attached to her husband; and Shakspeare loved to put into the lips of women beautiful expressions of love--but he did not intend that we should be deceived thereby in our moral judgements. SEWARD. Did this ever occur to you, sir? Macbeth, when hiring the murderers who are to look after Banquo and Fleance, cites a conversation in which he had demonstrated to them that the oppression under which they had long suffered, and which they had supposed to proceed from Macbeth, proceeded really from Banquo? My firm belief is that it proceeded from Macbeth--that their suspicion was right--that Macbeth is misleading them--and that Shakspeare means you to apprehend this. But why should Macbeth have oppressed his inferiors, unless he had been--long since--of a tyrannical nature? He oppresses his inferiors--they are sickened and angered with the world--by his oppression--he tells them 'twas not he but another who had oppressed them--and that other--at his instigation--they willingly murder. An ugly affair altogether. NORTH. Very. But let us keep to the First Act--and see what a hypocrite Macbeth has so very soon become--what a savage assassin! He has just followed up his Soliloquy with these significant lines-- "Come what come may, _Time and the hour run through the roughest day_;"