This account, it will be observed, is dated posterior to the opening of
Parliament. We may therefore be told that the depression had no
existence at the time when the royal speech was framed. Such was not the
case. The depression was felt much earlier, as appears by the following
extract taken from a favourite organ of the Free-traders. On 1st
December last, the _Economist_ thus spoke of the cotton trade—
“At the beginning of this year, great expectations were entertained of
our home demand. It was argued, and with good reason, that we never
yet had a year of general employment and low prices of provisions
combined, which was not also a year of very large domestic consumption
of manufactured fabrics. This year labour has been in very brisk
request, and food has never been so cheap and plentiful since 1836.
Yet our expectations from these facts have not been fully answered.
The sellers of printing-cloths and medium shirtings report that their
home demand has, on the whole, been good; the sellers of domestics
report, on the contrary, a decidedly dull business, worse than that of
last year; but we believe that all agree that the anticipations with
which they began the year have by no means been realised. We suspect
the cause to be this:—The depreciation in railway property, the
effects of the Irish famine, and the commercial crash in 1847, have
impoverished all classes of the community to a much greater extent
than has been allowed for in the calculations of our tradesmen. We
question whether ‘the power of purchase,’ on the part of the British
community, is nearly equal to what it was in 1845.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account