Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
“The King is most of all to blame, for having engaged in a conflict,
and, when victory was within his grasp, allowing it to slip from his
hands from want of resolution at the decisive moment. It is too soon
after these great and astonishing events to be able to form a decided
opinion on the whole details connected with them; but the concurring
statements from all parties go to prove that on the _first_ day the
troops of the line were perfectly steady; and history will record that
the heroic firmness of the Municipal Guard has rivalled all that is
most honourable in French history. The military force was immense; not
less than eighty thousand men, backed by strong forts, and amply
provided with all the muniments of war. Their success on the first day
was unbroken; they had carried above a hundred barricades, and were in
possession of all the military positions of the capital. But at this
moment the indecision of the King ruined everything. Age seems to have
extinguished the vigour for which he was once so celebrated. He shrank
from a contest with the insurgents, paralysed the troops by orders not
to fire on the people, and openly receded before the insurgent
populace, by abandoning Guizot and the firm policy which he himself
had adopted, and striving to conciliate revolution by the _mezzo
termini_ of Count Molé, and a more liberal cabinet. It is with retreat
in the presence of an insurrection, as in the case of an invading
army; the first move towards the rear is a certain step to ruin. The
moment it was seen that the King was giving way, all was paralysed,
because all foresaw to which side the victory would incline. The
soldiers threw away their muskets, the officers broke their swords,
and the vast array, equal to the army which fought at Austerlitz, was
dissolved like a rope of sand. Louis Philippe fell without either the
intrepidity of the royal martyr in 1793, or the dignity of the elder
house of Bourbon in 1830; and if it be true, as is generally said,
that the Queen urged the King to mount on horseback and die as ‘became
a King’ in front of the Tuileries, and he declined, preferring to
escape in disguise to this country, history must record, with shame,
that royalty perished in France without the virtues it was entitled to
expect in the meanest of its supporters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account