Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
You have hit it there, Talboys. Shakspeare, we have seen, in his calmer
constructions, shows, in a score of ways, weeks, months; that is
therefore the true time, or call it the historical time. Hurried
himself, and hurrying you on the torrent of passion, he forgets time,
and a false show of time, to the utmost contracted, arises. I do not
know whether he did not perceive this false exhibition of time, or
perceiving, he did not care. But we all must see a reason, and a cogent
one, why he should not let in the markings of protraction upon his
dialogues of the Seduced and the Seducer. You can conceive nothing
better than that the Poet, in the moment of composition, seizes the
views which at that moment offer themselves as effective—unconscious or
regardless of incompatibility. He is whole to the present; and as all is
feigned, he does not remember how the foregone makes the ongoing
impracticable. Have you ever before, Talboys, examined time in a Play of
Shakspeare? Much more, have you ever examined the treatment of time on
the Stage to which Shakspeare came, upon which he lived, and which he
left?
TALBOYS.
A good deal.
NORTH.
Not much, I suspect.
TALBOYS.
Why, not at all—except t’other day along with you—in Macbeth.
NORTH.
He came to a Stage which certainly had not cultivated the logic of time
as a branch of the Dramatic Art. It appears to me that those old people,
when they were enwrapt in the transport of their creative power, totally
forgot all regard, lost all consciousness of time. Passion does not know
the clock or the calendar. Intimations of time, now vague, now positive,
will continually occur; but also the Scenes float, like the Cyclades in
a Sea of Time, at distances utterly indeterminate—Most near? Most
remote? That is a Stage of Power, and not of Rules—Dynamic, not Formal.
I say again at last as at first, that the time of Othello, tried by the
notions of time in _our Art_, or tried, if you will, by the type of
prosaic and literal time, is—INSOLUBLE.
TALBOYS.
To the first question, therefore, being What is the truth of the matter?
the answer stands, I conceive without a shadow of doubt or difficulty,
“The time of Othello is—as real time—INSOLUBLE.”
NORTH.
By heavens, he echoes me!
TALBOYS.
Or, it is proposed incongruously, impossibly. Then arises the question,
How stood the time in the mind of Shakspeare?
NORTH.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account