Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 415, May, 1850
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
If we reflect on the many known instances of prophetic dreams, and on
the alleged and respectably attested cases of somnambulistic prevision,
we shall see reason to hesitate before we deny the possibility of the
occurrence, in certain individuals, of prophetic visions. We are far
from imagining that, if such have been the case with our German seers,
they have enjoyed direct communications from Heaven; on the contrary,
were we satisfied of the fact, we should regard it as a phenomenon
depending on some obscure physical cause, which may in time be
discovered and traced; and which, at all events, exists by Divine
permission.
Here we may allude to the remarkable prophecy of Monsieur de Cazotte,
who, some years previous to 1787, predicted to a large company of
persons of rank, science, and literature, with much detail, the
atrocities of the Reign of Terror. He likewise told many of those
present, both male and female, that they should perish on the
guillotine. To Condorcet he said, that he should die in prison, of the
effects of a poison which he should long, with the view of escaping a
public execution, have carried about his person—which happened. He also
predicted the fate of Louis XVI. and his Queen. This prophecy caused
much amazement, and soon became known. Persons are yet alive, both in
France and England, who heard it detailed before 1789. We have seen one
of them. Now, it might be said, that Cazotte merely exercised a rare
sagacity, in judging of the course of events, at a time when all France
was enthusiastically looking forward to the blessings of liberty, and
while yet no one dreamed of violence or bloodshed. But this would hardly
account for the details he gave. On the other hand, he often uttered
predictions; and it is very remarkable, although it has been too much
overlooked, that those who report his prophecies, including the above
one, always state that, when about to predict, he fell into a peculiar
state, _as if asleep_—yet not ordinary sleep. It can hardly be doubted
that this was a trance, in which he saw visions. That they were
fulfilled to the letter is surely, if only a coincidence, a most
wonderful one. If, again, it was merely the result of sagacious
reflection, how came it that Cazotte alone, of all the able thinkers
then in Paris, made these reflections, and was laughed at for his pains?
The laborious, minute, and conscientious researches of the Baron von
Reichenbach have proved, beyond a doubt, that we are far from being
acquainted with all the physical influences which surround us; and he
has even referred to a physical cause—_one_ source of the belief in
ghosts—by proving that luminous appearances are visible, to sensitive
persons, over recent graves. No one can fail to see the resemblance
between the Sensitives of Baron von Reichenbach, who are far from rare,
and the Spoikenkiker, or ghost seers, of the curate of Dortmund.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account