Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 70, No. 431, September 1851Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 70, No. 431, September 1851
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
twenty thousand feet in height, six or seven miles over in
illuminated surface, furrowed by a thousand colossal ravines,
torn by local tempests into peaks and promontories, and changing
its features with the majestic velocity of a volcano."--(Vol. i.
p. 228.)
The forms of clouds, it seems, are worth studying: after reading
this, no landscape-painter will be disposed, with hasty slight
invention, to sketch in these "_mountains_" of the sky. Here is his
description, or part of it, first of falling, then of running water.
With the incidental criticism upon painters we are not at present
concerned:--
"A little crumbling white or lightly-rubbed paper will soon give
the effect of indiscriminate foam; but nature gives more than
foam--she shows beneath it, and through it, a peculiar character
of exquisitely studied form, bestowed on every wave and line of
fall; and it is this variety of definite character which Turner
always aims at, rejecting as much as possible everything that
conceals or overwhelms it. Thus, in the Upper Fall of the Tees,
though the whole basin of the fall is blue, and dim with the
rising vapour, yet the attention of the spectator is chiefly
directed to the concentric zones and delicate curves of the
falling water itself; and it is impossible to express with what
exquisite accuracy these are given. They are the characteristic
of a powerful stream descending without impediment or break, but
from a narrow channel, so as to expand as it falls. They are the
constant form which such a stream assumes as it descends; and
yet I think it would be difficult to point to another instance
of their being rendered in art. You will find nothing in the
waterfalls, even of our best painters, but springing lines of
parabolic descent, and splashing and shapeless foam; and, in
consequence, though they may make you understand the swiftness
of the water, they never let you feel the weight of it: the
stream, in their hands, looks _active_, not _supine_, as if
it leaped, not as if it fell. Now, water will leap a little
way--it will leap down a weir or over a stone--but it _tumbles_
over a high fall like this; and it is when we have lost the
parabolic line, and arrived at the catenary--when we have lost
the spring of the fall, and arrived at the _plunge_ of it--that
we begin really to feel its weight and wildness. Where water
takes its first leap from the top, it is cool and collected,
and uninteresting and mathematical; but it is when it finds
that it has got into a scrape, and has farther to go than it
thought for, that its character comes out; it is then that it
begins to writhe and twist, and sweep out, zone after zone, in
wilder stretching as it falls, and to send down the rocket-like,
lance-pointed, whizzing shafts at its sides sounding for the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account