Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Shakspeare, Jonson, Beaumont, Massinger, and Webster, he will be a
gentleman. A man with friends like these will not go to the tap of the
Black Dog. Better spend his sixpence at Sadler’s Wells, and learn what
was going on in Rome in the time of Coriolanus, or learn the
thanklessness of sycophantic friends in the Athenian Timon. With the
bluff and brutal Henry VIII. they are quite familiar, and form a very
tolerable idea of a certain pinchbeck cardinal’s pride, from the
insolence of the overweening Wolsey. That energy and honour overcome all
impediments, they have long discovered from the story of the Lady of
Lyons, and the grandeur of self-devotion in the noble aspirations of
Ion. A world like this opening to their eyes, reflects a pleasant light
on the common earth they inhabit. “One touch of nature makes the whole
world kin.” The same sentiment brings a big sob into their rough
throats, and swells the gentle bosom of the delicate young lady in the
front row of the dress circle. If the Queen were there, there would be a
quivering of the royal lip. Jack Wiggins, the tinman, cries as if he
were flogged. Let us off to see Sadler’s Wells, where a new play is to
be acted, with our old friend James VI. for its hero. A pretty hero for
a play!—The pedantic, selfish, ambitious, and cowardly son of Mary
Stuart, who kissed the hand reeking with his mother’s blood, and held
out the Scottish crown to be an awmous-dish, into which Elizabeth
disdainfully threw her niggard charity, like an old maid depositing a
farthing in the plate at the Magdalen Hospital door. This play is
improperly called a tragedy, because a few people happen to be killed in
the course of it. The foundation is decidedly comic—horribly,
grotesquely comic. There the laughter tries in vain to banish the
shudder, and between them a compound is created which we believe to be
new to the stage. The conventional tyrant of tragedy is entirely done
away with. There are no knittings of brows and crossings of elbows,
starts and struttings, such as we generally see made the accompaniments
of revenge and hatred. There is a low, selfish, cruel nature, disguised
in ludicrous repartee and jocular conversation—a buffoon animated by the
soul of Richard III., a harlequin’s lath tipt with deadly poison—our
ordinary ideas turned topsy-turvy, and Polonius running his sword
through Hamlet behind the arras. Whether this historical view of James
be correct or not, does not matter to the play. It is the view chosen by
the author on a preponderating weight of evidence; and the point of his
career chosen for the development of these blacker portions of his
disposition is the Gowrie plot, where even the king’s adulators were
unable to hide the murmurs of the people, who certainly believed his
conduct to have been cruel and unjust.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account