Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
We have been forced already to confess that single-character pieces are
the only style of drama to which full justice can be done in any theatre
in London. Many people, deluded by this circumstance, and preferring the
perfection of one to the mediocrity of many, will gravely tell you that
the drama itself ought to be formed, in this respect, on the model of
the stage; that the interest ought to be concentred in the hero, and the
others kept entirely subordinate, or at least only endowed with vitality
enough to enable them to survive the kicks and buffets with which the
chief personage of the plot asserts his superiority. That one central
interest must exist in a properly-constructed drama, there is no doubt;
but it is a terrible narrowing of the author’s walk if you debar him
from affixing this interest to a group, and limit it entirely to one.
You force him to descend to mere peculiarities, and the evolvement of
character in its most contracted sense—thereby, and to this extent,
trenching upon the province of farce, which consists in a development of
the humours of some selected individual. The drama, on the other hand,
paints humanity in the abstract, modified in its particular action by
the position and character of the personages of the story; and in so far
as, for the sake of one chief actor, the movement of the play is made to
depend on him, the poet sinks from being the Titian or Michael Angelo of
his art, into the Watson Gordon, Phillips, or Pickersgill;—high names
certainly; but portrait-painting, even at its best, is not history. Let
any man read _Julius Cæsar_, and think of the Kembles, Young, Macready,
and Elliston all in the same play, and talk no more of a one-charactered
drama as the fittest for representation, and the highest of its class. A
one-charactered drama is only the best when there is but one good actor
in a theatre; if there were three good actors, a three-charactered play
would speedily arise; where all were good, Shakspeare would
reappear—that is to say, crowds would go to see Shakspeare, instead of
going, as now, to see this or that performer in Hamlet or Macbeth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account