Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
The title, however, is unquestionably appropriate enough, though it may
be calculated to mislead the reader. In his wanderings he has visited
the home domain both of the vine and the olive—at least he has passed
from the sanctuary of the one to the outskirts of the other; but we
could really wish that he had not profaned the goodly vintage by
reminding us of those lumps of vegetable fatness which sometimes, even
now, are served up at an octogenarian symposium, in honour of the
goddess Dyspepsia. We honour oil like the Sultan Saladin, and could wish
to see it brought into more general use in this country; but there is
something revolting to us in the sight and colour of the olive, which
has neither the freshness of youth nor the fine hue of maturity. The
last man whom we remember to have seen eating olives was an eminent
manufacturer of Staleybridge, who helped himself to the fruit of Minerva
with his short stubby fingers, descanting all the while on the propriety
of the enactment of a bill for augmenting the hours of infant labour. He
died, if we recollect aright, about a fortnight afterwards—perhaps in
consequence of the olives: if so, we are not disposed to deny that at
times they may be served up with advantage.
Mr Reach, however, loathes the olive as much as we do, and therefore
there is no difference of opinion between us. We like the fine
enthusiasm with which he does justice to the taste of our mother
country—a taste which we are certain will not decay so long as Leith
flourishes, and the house of Bell and Rannie continues to maintain its
pristine ascendancy in claret. With us in the north, we are glad to say
there is no recognised medium between Glenlivat and Bordeaux. Either
have in the hot water, or produce your ’34; nobody will thank you for
that port which you bought last week at an auction, and which you are
desirous to represent as having been bottled for your use about the era
of the Reform Bill. It may be both “curious” and “crusted,” as you say
it is; but you had better have it set aside to make sauce for
wild-ducks. Indeed, “curious” port is, for many reasons, a thing to be
avoided. We remember once dining at the house of an excellent clergyman
in the country, whose palate, however, might have undergone a little
more cultivation, with mutual advantage to himself and to his
acquaintance. On that occasion we were presented three times with a
certain fluid, under three different names; but all of us afterwards
agreed that it was the same liquor, varying simply in degree of
temperature. First, it came in smoking in a tureen, and was then called
hare-soup; secondly, it was poured out cold from a decanter, under the
denomination of port; third, and lastly, it came before us tepidly, with
the accompaniment of sugar and cream, and the red-armed Hebe who brought
the tray had the effrontery to assure us that it was coffee. So much for
the curious vintage of Oporto—but we are forgetting Mr Reach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account