Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
It is, however, quite apparent that, notwithstanding Lord John Russell’s
advances to the Radical party, the latter are by no means inclined to
place confidence in the Whigs. In every case in which such a movement
seems likely to be attended with any prospect of success, they are
putting forward candidates of their own—men whose adhesion to democratic
principles is beyond the possibility of a challenge. Persons whose names
were never before heard of—utterly briefless barristers, reporters and
writers for the Radical press, broken-down speculators, who consider a
career within the walls of St Stephen’s as the best method of effacing
the memory of the enormities of Capel Court, attorneys in dubious
practice, and the like class of characters—are presenting themselves to
constituencies rather on the strength of recommendations from the
Radical Reform Junta, than from any particular merits of their own. By
these men the Whigs are especially persecuted, and may, perhaps, in
various instances, be beaten. Yet, strange to say, the Whigs, as a
party, have not the courage to adopt any distinct principle, or announce
any determined line of action, which would serve at once to distinguish
and separate them from the fellowship of these political adventurers.
They are ashamed of their old party names, and persist in calling
themselves Liberals. Now, as we all know, Liberality is, in politics, an
exceedingly comprehensive term. Cuffey was a Liberal, so is Mr Feargus
O’Connor; so are Mr Joseph Hume, Mr John M’Gregor, Mr Cobden, Mr W.J.
Fox, Lord Melgund, and Mr James Moncrieff. And yet it would be difficult
to say upon what particular point, negations excluded, one and all of
these gentlemen are agreed. The fact is—and the Whigs know it—that there
is no such a thing as a united Liberal party, and that the soldering up
of their differences is impossible. When a Whig appeals to a
constituency as a Liberal, he is taking the worst and weakest, because
the most untenable, ground. He is acting the part of the Girondists, who
persisted in claiming kindred with the Montagnards, until the Mountain
fell upon and crushed them. It is this feature which distinguishes the
present from every previous contest. The chiefs of the Liberal sections
profess to act in concert and amity—they hold meetings, pass
resolutions, and lay down plans for future operations—their followers
are as much opposed to each other as Abram and Balthazar of the House of
Montague were to Sampson and Gregory of the House of Capulet. One thing
alone they agree in—they are determined to do everything in their power
to obstruct her Majesty’s present Government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account